Unit 1: The person I admire the most
Unit 2: My great vacation idea
1st Major Assignment - "Icebreaker: Introducing myself"
Unit 4: How to write an A+ research paper
Unit 5: Smoking should be banned completely
2nd Major Assignment - "Organizing my speech"
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jin, Hayeon
Video: Unit 4: How to write an A+ research paper
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The purpose of the speech is to inform the audience the way to write an A+ research paper. She explained it step by step. She started explaining about the ways to write hook. Then, she talked about writing outlines, first draft, and revising the essays at the end. Her points were well-organized.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was effective that her hook had grabbed me attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. She used a step-by-step method in explaining the ways to write a good research paper. Her transition was very smooth as well.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. She ended her speech by cheering the audience to write good research papers using the ways she had introduced.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She was very enthusiastic. Although there were no humor and visual aids, her speech was very clear and easy to follow.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Here gestures were diverse and her eye contact was stable.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. I appreciate speed of talking that it was very easy to follow. Plus, her pronunciation was very clear.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Sunyoung Park
Speaker: Yun Hyowon
Video: 2nd major video
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Softness
1. When it comes to work.
2. When it comes to human relationship.
What she realized
Old tale of ralph waldo emerson showing the opposite power and effect of softness and hardness
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She started with a quotation from Chinese philosopher and she extracted main idea of the quotation and smoothly moved on to her main topic, softness.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
When she delivered her second point, she told her own story about two contradicting friends. I thought it was effective to show the importance of softness.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She didn’t restate 3 points but mentioned them. Also, it was memorable because not as usual, she wrapped up her speech by “I want you to share this idea with as many people as possible.” More impressive and powerful than just thank you for listeing.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
After she showed the statistics, she paused for a short time and by saying “it’s impressive, isn’t it” or “pretty great”, she highlighted individual supporting details.
Visual aids yes. Used PPT
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Not too much and not too little. It was just adequate. Wasn’t just looking at her script but made eye contacts and natural gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Very clearly. Even though it was hard for me to catch some words, it was all great.
If you read my comment can you tell me what comes before the line “lastly I want to highlight~” ? thank you so much.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Sunyoung Park
Speaker: Yun Hyowon
Video: 2nd major video
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Softness
1. When it comes to work.
2. When it comes to human relationship.
What she realized
Old tale of ralph waldo emerson showing the opposite power and effect of softness and hardness
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She started with a quotation from Chinese philosopher and she extracted main idea of the quotation and smoothly moved on to her main topic, softness.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
When she delivered her second point, she told her own story about two contradicting friends. I thought it was effective to show the importance of softness.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She didn’t restate 3 points but mentioned them. Also, it was memorable because not as usual, she wrapped up her speech by “I want you to share this idea with as many people as possible.” More impressive and powerful than just thank you for listeing.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
After she showed the statistics, she paused for a short time and by saying “it’s impressive, isn’t it” or “pretty great”, she highlighted individual supporting details.
Visual aids yes. Used PPT
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Not too much and not too little. It was just adequate. Wasn’t just looking at her script but made eye contacts and natural gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Very clearly. Even though it was hard for me to catch some words, it was all great.
If you read my comment can you tell me what comes before the line “lastly I want to highlight~” ? thank you so much.