Date : June 3, 2017 Evaluator: Jeonghaeng Lee Speaker: Juyeon Oh Assignment Title : Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of her speech is to introduce her opinion—which is yes—about euthanasia. Her main points were: people should have control over their lives, and people shouldn’t suffer from illnesses.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There wasn’t a ‘hook’ like asking a question to the audience, or reversing a statement. However, she used the way of giving the audience the definition of the word which she was going to talk about. It was greatly effective. For a topic like this, it was a nice intro.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, highly logical. She started her speech by giving the definition of euthanasia, and showed two supporting reasons (main points). She had many examples prepared, like how people are traveling to places where euthanasia is legal. She also made great transitions, just like a flowing river.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She ended her speech by summarizing her speech and emphasizing her opinion again, which was definitely memorable. After watching her speech, I can now say to people why I’m for euthanasia, giving them tons of reasons and examples.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, She was enthusiastic, and made great use of pauses. But because her topic was a serious one, she couldn’t use humor. Visual aids weren’t used, but because she elaborated well, I had no problem in understanding her points.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She didn’t use body languages ‘enthusiastically’, because of her topic. But overall posture and eye contact were great. Like a professional.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Her speech was highly comprehensible. Volume, pronunciation, and everything was just so good. Thanks for your wonderful speech, Juyeon.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Na Yeon Lim Speaker: Juyeon Oh Assignment/Title : Unit 4 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall speech was about ‘History of Industrial Revolution,’ there were a lot of advancements made during industrial revolution to ease people’s life. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, she started with the connections about AI that it one of the issues nowadays. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, she had a clear structure which illustrated first and second industrial revolution. Her preparation was splendid. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? I believe it was memorable because it was directly related to out major, EICC. She summarized the merits and demerits of industrialization. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She had an effective use of her ppt slides. Also, her enthusiasm was obvious throughout her speech by seeing how hard she prepared. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her eye contact was good. Her gestures were natural explaining. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, her speech was easy to follow along and understand. Her Brittish accent was easy to understand.
Date: 06/06/2017 Evaluator: Hayoung Lee Speaker: Juyeon Oh Assignment Title: A Great Vacation Idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker recommends her audience to visit Madagascar for the upcoming summer vacation. Her supporting details were great.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, there was a hook. Mentioning how much people are in want of great vacations, she gave a suggestion for the next vacation spot. Her hook was effective in that she built up an idea that the audience really needs a great vacation idea. Then, she gave Madagascar as the next travel destination. It could have been improved if she had given a slight pause between ‘If you are feeling the same way?’ and ‘If you are’. Maybe a second of two for the audience to think about it? : )
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was logical. Transitions were smooth and nice between ideas. Her points were supported by various descriptions. She talked about unique flora and fauna when discussing the national parks. She gave an example of how to enjoy the tropical beach. She also mentioned the travel is costly from Korea because travellers must transfer as there is no direct flight to Madagascar from Korea.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Her conclusion was concise and was effective. Her main points were not quite summarized but her conclusion was still strong and persuasive to the audience. The closing was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She was enthusiastic. She did not use any visuals, but I think it could have been better if she gave some images of Madagascar. Vivid images of National Parks and tropical beaches might have helped in describing Madagascar.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. The speaker’s body language was effective but I noticed that she was rather staying still when discussing her main points. Maybe a little bit more of gestures will be effective. Her eye contact was great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Her volume was good and her pronunciation was clear. I could not understand some parts, but it is my personal thing – British accent is a bit tough for me to understand. Though not perfectly comprehensible for ME (it would be just for me, I suppose!), I really loved her accent. British accents, so fancy.
Thank you for sharing your speech with us, Juyeon! : )
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She explained great vacation in Madagascar. I think audiences can fully understand her content well. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I was impressed with her preparation for presentation. She memorized all presentation content and structure, so she could go through the contents in a very smoothly. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? She well arranged why she recommend to go vacation to Madagascar. Also, she well supported the beauty of Madagascar by examples. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She encouraged to go to Madagascar based on her experience. This made me want to go to Madagascar. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. She didn’t use visual aids. It could be better if she use power point or pictures to make it easier to understand. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She shook her body a little but that did not matter too much. And she had many eye contacts with video shooter. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Her voice was clearly and audibly enough to hear presentation. And the volume of her voice is enough too.
Evaluator : Jaehee Chung Speaker : Juyeon Oh Video : Ice breaker Date : 2017.06.08
1. What strong points does the speaker already have? -Her English is very fluent and she looks confident. 2. How well did the audience get to know the speaker? -I got to know about her very well after watching this video. I knew about her childhood background, favorite sports, and trigger finger! 3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? -Yes. She did prepare nice ppt which helped me get to know about her and I thought the speech was well prepared because she looked very confident 4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? -Yes. She talked clear in adequate volume 5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? -Yes. She started the speech showing her childhood picture and introduced her 6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes. -She barely used her notes and fully memorized what she wants to talk about 7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? -Nothing. I think she is already a perfect presenter! 8. What did you like about the presentation? -I really liked the contents and some photos of her in ppt were very interesting. She introduced herself really well in nice clear voice and in a confident mood. I’ve got to know about her little bit more through this video
Date : June 3, 2017
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jeonghaeng Lee
Speaker: Juyeon Oh
Assignment Title : Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of her speech is to introduce her opinion—which is yes—about euthanasia. Her main points were: people should have control over their lives, and people shouldn’t suffer from illnesses.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There wasn’t a ‘hook’ like asking a question to the audience, or reversing a statement. However, she used the way of giving the audience the definition of the word which she was going to talk about. It was greatly effective. For a topic like this, it was a nice intro.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, highly logical. She started her speech by giving the definition of euthanasia, and showed two supporting reasons (main points). She had many examples prepared, like how people are traveling to places where euthanasia is legal. She also made great transitions, just like a flowing river.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She ended her speech by summarizing her speech and emphasizing her opinion again, which was definitely memorable. After watching her speech, I can now say to people why I’m for euthanasia, giving them tons of reasons and examples.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She was enthusiastic, and made great use of pauses. But because her topic was a serious one, she couldn’t use humor. Visual aids weren’t used, but because she elaborated well, I had no problem in understanding her points.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She didn’t use body languages ‘enthusiastically’, because of her topic. But overall posture and eye contact were great. Like a professional.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Her speech was highly comprehensible. Volume, pronunciation, and everything was just so good. Thanks for your wonderful speech, Juyeon.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Na Yeon Lim
Speaker: Juyeon Oh
Assignment/Title : Unit 4
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall speech was about ‘History of Industrial Revolution,’ there were a lot of advancements made during industrial revolution to ease people’s life.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, she started with the connections about AI that it one of the issues nowadays.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, she had a clear structure which illustrated first and second industrial revolution. Her preparation was splendid.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I believe it was memorable because it was directly related to out major, EICC. She summarized the merits and demerits of industrialization.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She had an effective use of her ppt slides. Also, her enthusiasm was obvious throughout her speech by seeing how hard she prepared.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her eye contact was good. Her gestures were natural explaining.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, her speech was easy to follow along and understand. Her Brittish accent was easy to understand.
Date: 06/06/2017
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hayoung Lee
Speaker: Juyeon Oh
Assignment Title: A Great Vacation Idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speaker recommends her audience to visit Madagascar for the upcoming summer vacation. Her supporting details were great.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, there was a hook. Mentioning how much people are in want of great vacations, she gave a suggestion for the next vacation spot. Her hook was effective in that she built up an idea that the audience really needs a great vacation idea. Then, she gave Madagascar as the next travel destination. It could have been improved if she had given a slight pause between ‘If you are feeling the same way?’ and ‘If you are’. Maybe a second of two for the audience to think about it? : )
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. Transitions were smooth and nice between ideas. Her points were supported by various descriptions. She talked about unique flora and fauna when discussing the national parks. She gave an example of how to enjoy the tropical beach. She also mentioned the travel is costly from Korea because travellers must transfer as there is no direct flight to Madagascar from Korea.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Her conclusion was concise and was effective. Her main points were not quite summarized but her conclusion was still strong and persuasive to the audience. The closing was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She was enthusiastic. She did not use any visuals, but I think it could have been better if she gave some images of Madagascar. Vivid images of National Parks and tropical beaches might have helped in describing Madagascar.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
The speaker’s body language was effective but I noticed that she was rather staying still when discussing her main points. Maybe a little bit more of gestures will be effective. Her eye contact was great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Her volume was good and her pronunciation was clear. I could not understand some parts, but it is my personal thing – British accent is a bit tough for me to understand. Though not perfectly comprehensible for ME (it would be just for me, I suppose!), I really loved her accent. British accents, so fancy.
Thank you for sharing your speech with us, Juyeon! : )
Feedback for unit 2
ReplyDeleteDate : 2017.06.07
Evaluator: Hyeonseok Nho
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She explained great vacation in Madagascar. I think audiences can fully understand her content well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I was impressed with her preparation for presentation. She memorized all presentation content and structure, so she could go through the contents in a very smoothly.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She well arranged why she recommend to go vacation to Madagascar. Also, she well supported the beauty of Madagascar by examples.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She encouraged to go to Madagascar based on her experience. This made me want to go to Madagascar.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.
She didn’t use visual aids. It could be better if she use power point or pictures to make it easier to understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She shook her body a little but that did not matter too much. And she had many eye contacts with video shooter.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Her voice was clearly and audibly enough to hear presentation. And the volume of her voice is enough too.
Evaluator : Jaehee Chung
ReplyDeleteSpeaker : Juyeon Oh
Video : Ice breaker
Date : 2017.06.08
1. What strong points does the speaker already have?
-Her English is very fluent and she looks confident.
2. How well did the audience get to know the speaker?
-I got to know about her very well after watching this video. I knew about her childhood background, favorite sports, and trigger finger!
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
-Yes. She did prepare nice ppt which helped me get to know about her and I thought the speech was well prepared because she looked very confident
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
-Yes. She talked clear in adequate volume
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
-Yes. She started the speech showing her childhood picture and introduced her
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes.
-She barely used her notes and fully memorized what she wants to talk about
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
-Nothing. I think she is already a perfect presenter!
8. What did you like about the presentation?
-I really liked the contents and some photos of her in ppt were very interesting. She introduced herself really well in nice clear voice and in a confident mood. I’ve got to know about her little bit more through this video