Speech Feedback Date: 2017.06.01 Evaluator: Seounho Kim Speaker: Minjee Kim Assignment/Title: Minjee Kim/Thurs 1-2/Major assignment
Speech Value-1, She introduced about Parliamentary debate style which is not commonly known among other people. I also first got to know about this type of debate style
Preparation- 1, She memorized literally every line of her speech so she did not use note at all and it was really cool. Also she made PPT using appropriate pictures that include her own experiences.
Organization- 1, The goal of her speech was sharing information so she first talked about why she chosed the topic and for the rest, talked about it specifically, in a way that the audience could get her presentation.
Opening - 1, She opened her speech by talking reasons for choosing the topic and it was really impressive for she used effective gestures and intonation. It was very attractive and novel way for me.
Body - 1, In body she specified her main topic, ‘Parliamentary debate style’, using her well made PPT. I like the way she looked at camera which showed confidence and how well she prepared for her speech.
Conclusion- 1, In conclusion she talked about her own experience. She also tried to persuade the audience about how fun and good to learn about Parliamentary debate style.
Transitions- 1, Unlike other speeches I have seen so far, her speech was really fun and interesting as she used natural gestures with clear and audible voice. There are no flaws that I can talk about. Her presentation was perfect in all aspects.
What did you like about the presentation?
When I first saw main topic of her speech I thought it would be boring as it was about uncommon debate style. But with her witty remarks and gestures totally fell for her speech. Topic, posture, voice and at all parts I liked them a lot. Thanks for sharing your awesome speech Minjee!
Title: 2nd Major Assignment Evaluator: Sunyoung Park Presenter: Minjee Kim Date: 2017/ 06/01
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 1 when I first heard the topic, parliamentary debate, it first sounded like a boring and difficult topic. But as soon as the topic got deeper, and the speaker was more into the speech, i could find it interesting.
Preparation (Research, rehearsal) 1 the speaker looked comfortable and relieved. that means there were lots of preparation work!
Organization (Logical, clear) 1
the speech follows the exact process of parliamentary debate style. It was logical enough.
Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2
smooth and great opening.
Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 1
the speaker showed the huge passion she had for this debate style and it made me also interested in the style too. the power of her voice and the certainty that she was conveying. great.
Conclusion (Effective) 1
great smooth conclusion.
Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 1 First, second, third. Numbers are the clearest signposts.
What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? maybe slow down little bit..? What did you like about the presentation? when you emphasize the whip part!
Speech Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate: 2017.06.01
Evaluator: Seounho Kim
Speaker: Minjee Kim
Assignment/Title: Minjee Kim/Thurs 1-2/Major assignment
Speech Value-1, She introduced about Parliamentary debate style which is not commonly known among other people. I also first got to know about this type of debate style
Preparation- 1, She memorized literally every line of her speech so she did not use note at all and it was really cool. Also she made PPT using appropriate pictures that include her own experiences.
Organization- 1, The goal of her speech was sharing information so she first talked about why she chosed the topic and for the rest, talked about it specifically, in a way that the audience could get her presentation.
Opening - 1, She opened her speech by talking reasons for choosing the topic and it was really impressive for she used effective gestures and intonation. It was very attractive and novel way for me.
Body - 1, In body she specified her main topic, ‘Parliamentary debate style’, using her well made PPT. I like the way she looked at camera which showed confidence and how well she prepared for her speech.
Conclusion- 1, In conclusion she talked about her own experience. She also tried to persuade the audience about how fun and good to learn about Parliamentary debate style.
Transitions- 1, Unlike other speeches I have seen so far, her speech was really fun and interesting as she used natural gestures with clear and audible voice. There are no flaws that I can talk about. Her presentation was perfect in all aspects.
What did you like about the presentation?
When I first saw main topic of her speech I thought it would be boring as it was about uncommon debate style. But with her witty remarks and gestures totally fell for her speech. Topic, posture, voice and at all parts I liked them a lot. Thanks for sharing your awesome speech Minjee!
Title: 2nd Major Assignment
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Sunyoung Park
Presenter: Minjee Kim
Date: 2017/ 06/01
Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) 1
when I first heard the topic, parliamentary debate, it first sounded like a boring and difficult topic. But as soon as the topic got deeper, and the speaker was more into the speech, i could find it interesting.
Preparation (Research, rehearsal) 1
the speaker looked comfortable and relieved. that means there were lots of preparation work!
Organization (Logical, clear) 1
the speech follows the exact process of parliamentary debate style. It was logical enough.
Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic) 2
smooth and great opening.
Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material) 1
the speaker showed the huge passion she had for this debate style and it made me also interested in the style too. the power of her voice and the certainty that she was conveying. great.
Conclusion (Effective) 1
great smooth conclusion.
Transitions (appropriate, helpful) 1
First, second, third. Numbers are the clearest signposts.
What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
maybe slow down little bit..?
What did you like about the presentation?
when you emphasize the whip part!