Date : 1-JUN-2017 Evaluator: Joonhyung Kim (THU 1-2) Speaker: Seonghwan Cho Assignment/Title : Second Major Assignment-Death Penalty
1. Speech Value - 5 Death penalty is still a hot potato in the world. And I can see his points.
2. Preparation - 4 I like the PPT file and the photos he used.
3. Organization - 5 It had opening, body and conclusion. Also, it was logical.
4. Opening - 5 He brought recent issues that can led the audience into the topic.
5. Body - 5 It was well prepared and had proper reasons.
6. Conclusion - 4 He summarized his speech.
7. Transitions - 5 I followed his speech easily.
8. What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? I know this was recorded and for me it was really good to see his eye contact(to the camera). But as the speaker had the audience, It would be better if he had used the eye contact with them.
9. What did you like about the presentation? I like the way he speak, including tone and vocabulary, because it was proper for the topic.
Speech Feedback Date : June 1, 2017 Evaluator: Hyunseo Jung Speaker: seonghwan cho Assignment/Title : death penalty 1.Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience It was really great. By this video, I could understand and know his perception about death penalty. And also as his view was as same as mine, so it was really interesting. 2. Preparation (Research, rehearsal) he prepared great visual materials and tried to memorize most of his speech 3. Organization (Logical, clear): He had really clear opening, body, and closing. The composition of his whole speech was really nice 4. Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic He started the speech by asking question. So it really caught my attention.
5. Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material She explained the reason why he disagrees with death penalty by analyzing many reasons. Also with the interesting visual material, It was easy to follow his thoughts. 6. Conclusion (Effective): He finished his presentation by summarizing his main points. I think that part was really nice.
* What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? he tried hard to interact with the audiences but I think it would be better if he pointed or introduced his visual aids to the audiences. 1. * What did you like about the presentation? I like the whole composition of his speech. As it was well organized, it was really easy to catch his purpose. Thank you for sharing your wonderful opinion!
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : 1-JUN-2017
Evaluator: Joonhyung Kim (THU 1-2)
Speaker: Seonghwan Cho
Assignment/Title : Second Major Assignment-Death Penalty
1. Speech Value - 5
Death penalty is still a hot potato in the world. And I can see his points.
2. Preparation - 4
I like the PPT file and the photos he used.
3. Organization - 5
It had opening, body and conclusion. Also, it was logical.
4. Opening - 5
He brought recent issues that can led the audience into the topic.
5. Body - 5
It was well prepared and had proper reasons.
6. Conclusion - 4
He summarized his speech.
7. Transitions - 5
I followed his speech easily.
8. What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
I know this was recorded and for me it was really good to see his eye contact(to the camera). But as the speaker had the audience, It would be better if he had used the eye contact with them.
9. What did you like about the presentation?
I like the way he speak, including tone and vocabulary, because it was proper for the topic.
Speech Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : June 1, 2017
Evaluator: Hyunseo Jung
Speaker: seonghwan cho
Assignment/Title : death penalty
1.Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience
It was really great. By this video, I could understand and know his perception about death penalty. And also as his view was as same as mine, so it was really interesting.
2. Preparation (Research, rehearsal)
he prepared great visual materials and tried to memorize most of his speech
3. Organization (Logical, clear):
He had really clear opening, body, and closing. The composition of his whole speech was really nice
4. Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic
He started the speech by asking question. So it really caught my attention.
5. Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material
She explained the reason why he disagrees with death penalty by analyzing many reasons. Also with the interesting visual material, It was easy to follow his thoughts.
6. Conclusion (Effective):
He finished his presentation by summarizing his main points. I think that part was really nice.
* What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
he tried hard to interact with the audiences but I think it would be better if he pointed or introduced his visual aids to the audiences.
1. * What did you like about the presentation?
I like the whole composition of his speech. As it was well organized, it was really easy to catch his purpose. Thank you for sharing your wonderful opinion!