Speaking Feedback Date :5/27 Evaluator:Jimin Choi Speaker:Hyobin Jeon Assignment/Title : Second major assignment 1. What was the speakers strongest main point? First of all, she has clear and proper voice tone and pace. That makes me focus on her presentation. Plus, before starting the body, she clearly said that she's on the negative side. It let me know her perspective well. 2. What did you like about the presentation? She tried to communicate with audience . 3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? At the beginning , she explained the meaning of "Syria refugees". That helps people know what it is and makes them curious of it. 4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Without any visual materials or ppt, she present her speech. 5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? She talked clearly. Especially, she used proper pause so I can hear and understand some points. 6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? As I mentioned already, she clearly show her opinion by saying "I'm standing on negative positiob" before starting body. Also, she consist body by dividing the main point into small three points. 7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. She didn't use notes. Eye contact was good! 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? This time she did well her speech without using ppt. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? Her topic is kinda sensitive and controversial. It's good topic which makes audience think their opinion. Moreover, I can understand her speech very well ,thanks to her voice tone and clear points.
Date : 2017.5.28. Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Speaker : Hyobin Jeon Assignment/Title : second major assignment
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point? Her main point of the speech is that South Korea should not accept Syrian refugees. 2. What did you like about the presentation? She had 3 clear and strong reasons to support her argument in the speech. Also, she was calm when she was making her presentation. 3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? She first starts her presentation by giving her own opinions about accepting Syrian refugees. Then, she provides 3 specific reasons to support her argument. Finally, she gives her own solution for this problem. 4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? Yes, she did. I could see that she prepared a lot for this presentation. 5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? Yes, she did. Her speech was clear and audible. 6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? Her presentation included a strong opening, body, and conclusion. 7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. She did not use any notes during her presentation. Also, she made a lot of eye contact with the audience. 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? It would have been better if the conclusion part of the speech was a little longer, but it was generally a good presentation. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? She utilized a lot of body languages that aided her to convey the information to her audience effectively. Also, her 3 reasons were all appropriate for supporting her main idea.
Title : second major assignment Date : 2017. 6. 1. Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Speaker : Hyobin Jeon
* Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience) : 1 / She talked about whether South Korea should accept Syrian refugees or not.
* Preparation (Research, rehearsal) : 1 / I could see that she prepared a lot for this presentation. She did not use any notes during her presentation, and had strong opinions.
* Organization (Logical, clear) : 1 / Her presentation had a clear opening, body, and conclusion. She first starts her presentation by giving her own opinions about accepting Syrian refugees. Then, she provides 3 specific reasons to support her argument. Finally, she gives her own solutions for this problem.
* Opening (Attention-getting, led to topic) : 1 / Her opening was able to explain her main idea clearly.
* Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate, support material) : 1 / The three reasons that she provided in order to support her ideas were all strong and adequate.
* Conclusion (Effective) : 2 / The conclusion part of the speech was a little short, but it still shows the main ideas properly.
* Transition (appropriate, helpful) : 1 / I think she utilized transitions appropriately in her presentation.
* What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? : She could have strengthened her conclusion part of the speech, but it was generally a good speech.
* What did you like about the presentation? : She utilized her body languages that aided her to convey the information to the audience effectively. Also, her 3 reasons were all appropriate for supporting her main idea.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking Feedback
Date :5/27
Evaluator:Jimin Choi
Speaker:Hyobin Jeon
Assignment/Title : Second major assignment
1. What was the speakers strongest main point?
First of all, she has clear and proper voice tone and pace. That makes me focus on her presentation.
Plus, before starting the body, she clearly said that she's on the negative side. It let me know her perspective well.
2. What did you like about the presentation?
She tried to communicate with audience .
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
At the beginning , she explained the meaning of "Syria refugees". That helps people know what it is and makes them curious of it.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Without any visual materials or ppt, she present her speech.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
She talked clearly. Especially, she used proper pause so I can hear and understand some points.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
As I mentioned already, she clearly show her opinion by saying "I'm standing on negative positiob" before starting body. Also, she consist body by dividing the main point into small three points.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
She didn't use notes. Eye contact was good!
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
This time she did well her speech without using ppt.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
Her topic is kinda sensitive and controversial. It's good topic which makes audience think their opinion.
Moreover, I can understand her speech very well ,thanks to her voice tone and clear points.
Speaking Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : 2017.5.28.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
Speaker : Hyobin Jeon
Assignment/Title : second major assignment
1. What was the speaker’s strongest main point?
Her main point of the speech is that South Korea should not accept Syrian refugees.
2. What did you like about the presentation?
She had 3 clear and strong reasons to support her argument in the speech. Also, she was calm when she was
making her presentation.
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
She first starts her presentation by giving her own opinions about accepting Syrian refugees. Then, she provides
3 specific reasons to support her argument. Finally, she gives her own solution for this problem.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
Yes, she did. I could see that she prepared a lot for this presentation.
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
Yes, she did. Her speech was clear and audible.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
Her presentation included a strong opening, body, and conclusion.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
She did not use any notes during her presentation. Also, she made a lot of eye contact with the audience.
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
It would have been better if the conclusion part of the speech was a little longer, but it was generally a good
presentation.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
She utilized a lot of body languages that aided her to convey the information to her audience
effectively. Also, her 3 reasons were all appropriate for supporting her main idea.
Speaking feedback
ReplyDeleteTitle : second major assignment
Date : 2017. 6. 1.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
Speaker : Hyobin Jeon
* Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience)
: 1 / She talked about whether South Korea should accept Syrian refugees or not.
* Preparation (Research, rehearsal)
: 1 / I could see that she prepared a lot for this presentation. She did not use any notes during her presentation, and had strong opinions.
* Organization (Logical, clear)
: 1 / Her presentation had a clear opening, body, and conclusion. She first starts her presentation by giving her own opinions about accepting Syrian refugees. Then, she provides 3 specific reasons to support her argument. Finally, she gives her own solutions for this problem.
* Opening (Attention-getting, led to topic)
: 1 / Her opening was able to explain her main idea clearly.
* Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate, support material)
: 1 / The three reasons that she provided in order to support her ideas were all strong and adequate.
* Conclusion (Effective)
: 2 / The conclusion part of the speech was a little short, but it still shows the main ideas properly.
* Transition (appropriate, helpful)
: 1 / I think she utilized transitions appropriately in her presentation.
* What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
: She could have strengthened her conclusion part of the speech, but it was generally a good speech.
* What did you like about the presentation?
: She utilized her body languages that aided her to convey the information to the audience effectively. Also, her 3 reasons were all appropriate for supporting her main idea.