Saturday, May 27, 2017

Juyeon Oh/Major Assignment 2/Thurs 3-4

3 comments:

  1. Speaking Feedback
    Title: Save Our Planet! simply by putting away our smartphones.
    Evaluator: Yohan Seo
    Speaker: Juyeon Oh
    Date: 30th, May, 2017

    1. Speech Value (Interesting, meaningful to audience): 1, Her topic was interesting and speech was brilliant as I expected.
    2. Preparation (Research, rehearsal): 2, Her ppt showed that she prepared a lot. But, there were some pauses that didn't bother the audience too much.
    3. Organization (Logical, clear): 1, She made her opening with a kind of survey and a quotation of Albert Einstein, body with scientific and biological facts, such as electromagnetic release and polination, and solution. And she ended her speech with Leonardo DiCaprio's saying and suggesting the audience should do for our environment.
    4. Opening (Attention-getting, led into topic): 2, Although she started with two questions, in my opinion, the opening was a little short. But, other than that, it was truly okay, questions and the quotation were interesting.
    5. Body (Flowed smoothly, appropriate support material): 1, Flowing was undoubtedly good. And as I mentioned at '3. Organization', prepared scientific and biological facts were astonishing. In addition to the facts, the result of the bumblebee experiment was also interesting.
    6. Conclusion (Effective): 1, She asked the audience to put away our mobile phones and focus on the environment with Leonardo DiCaprio's saying which strengthens her conclusion. The quoting the actor's was effective.
    7. Transitions (appropriate, helpful): 1, She linked her speech well.

    * What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
    I believe she is a great speaker with a fascinating british accent, but it'd be better that she prepared for her speech so that she can speak much more smoother and make few pauses. And it'd be okay that she speaks slowly.
    * What did you like about the presentation?
    Her preparation of much information on ppt and, of course, her speech was admirable. Her gestures made me pay attetion to the speech.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Speaking Feedback

    Date : 1-JUN-2017
    Evaluator: Joonhyung Kim (THU 1-2)
    Speaker: Juyeon Oh
    Assignment/Title : Second Major Assignment / The relationship between smartphones and the environment.

    1. Speech Value - 5
    It was really interesting that I haven’t thought about that there is a relationship between smartphones and the environment(especially bees.)

    2. Preparation - 5
    Because there were PPT slides, I understood easily some difficult points.

    3. Organization - 5
    It had opening, body and conclusion. Also, it was logical and interesting.

    4. Opening - 5
    She threw some questions that the audience can guess with interests and no difficulty.

    5. Body - 5
    It was well structured.

    6. Conclusion - 4
    She brought the quote by DiCaprio and it made an impression.

    7. Transitions - 4
    I like the way that the presentation went. But maybe if there were signal words, I could understand the flow much better.


    8. What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
    I like her pace in speech. But sometimes, it was too fast to catch up. It would be better to use some pauses, then I think the audience could follow the presentation more easily.

    9. What did you like about the presentation?
    She was truly confident. And her gesture was obviously expressive and help me to follow her words. Thank for presenting :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Generic Presentation Evaluation
    Evaluator: Sunyoung Park
    Speaker: Juyeon Oh
    Video: 2nd major assignments
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
     Electromagnetic waves are released when smartphone are activated.
     Bees are harmfully affected and like a chain effect, the crops and fruits which rely on pollination of bees will be no more available
     And the solutions.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
     By asking questions, she brought audiences into her speech
     It was great to show in the video that for the 1st question, everyone raised their hands, where as on the 2nd, none did.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
     After demonstrated the process of experiment, a few possible solutions come.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
     Concluded with the quotation from Leonardo dicafio which had huge impact. Wrapped it up well.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
     Electromagnetic waves is a difficult concept which is not common for most of the audience, so she used visual aids for it. Great
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
     Freely used, not too much, not too little.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
     More than good. Her accent, intonation, pronunciation were all good.

    ReplyDelete