Saturday, May 27, 2017

Seounho Kim/ Major assignment/ PIE Thurs 34

https://youtu.be/p3c-2lVQJYg

2 comments:


  1. Speaking Feedback
    Date :5/27
    Evaluator:Jimin Choi
    Speaker : Seounho Kim
    Assignment/Title : Second major assignment
    1. What was the speakers strongest main point?
    It's about IS. She mainly explain what is IS and what they did. Lastly she talked about solution.
    2. What did you like about the presentation?
    Clear and well made ppt helps me understand her speech.
    3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
    At the beginning , she introduced a bad news which made the audience focus on her presentation. Then she explained what she will present.
    4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
    She didn't look at her script and just talked her speech!
    5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
    She has clear voice and overall, her speaking pace was good
    6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
    It has clear opening and body. But what I suggest is that it is good to stress the conclusion.
    7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
    She didn't use notes.

    8.What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
    It was creative that she suggest some solutions. Because ,usually as some of videos about IS I've watched, they said just how terrible and cruelty they are and there was no solutions! So it was so good video!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Speech Feedback
    Date : May, 30 / 2017
    Evaluator: Jin, Hayeon
    Speaker: Kim, Seounho
    Assignment/Title : Seounho Kim/ Major assignment/ PIE Thurs 34

    1. Speech Value: 1 I am really thankful that she talked about the terrorism. Since we can be the next target, we should really be alert and always show concern for the terror incidents.
    2. Preparation: 1 She used clear and effective visual aid. She rarely looked at her script. It was obvious that she prepared a lot.
    3. Organization: 1 Her introduction, body, and conclusion were smoothly organized. Plus, her explanation of IS and the solution for terrorism were very logical and organized that I could easily follow her.
    4. Opening: 1 She started with reading the SNS post of Ariana Grande in order to bring her topic, IS. It was effective because we all know that current issue.
    5. Body: 1 The body part of her speech contained the explanation of IS, Paris Terror Attack, and the solution of terrorism. They were rightly connected and well presented.
    6. Conclusion: 1 She ended with an appropriate quotation that added power to her call for action at the end when she mentioned about the cooperation.
    7. Transitions: 1 The introduction, body, and conclusion of her speech were smoothly connected.

    8. What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
    I could not find any flaws in her speech except one thing that she did not introduced herself before she started speaking. Perhaps, it was her intention to directly begin with her speech in order to grasp the attention of audience. It is just a matter of personal preference.

    9. What did you like about the presentation?
    I liked that she chose the right topic in the right moment. Nowadays, peoples’ eyes are on the issues of the terrors happening. It was good to hear the solution about it.

    ReplyDelete