Speech Feedback Date : 1/6, 2017 Evaluator: Sangwon Park Speaker: Minyong Han Assignment/Title : Minyong Han/Major/Thur 3-4
Speech Value: 1. His topic was interesting to me because people usually think socialism is the bad thing, but he said it is needed. Preparation: 2. he sometimes use his paper, if he memorized it, I will give 1. Organization: 1. He organized well the opening, body, and closer. Opening: 1. He started with interesting ppt. Body: 2. the content in his speech like contrast was good. Conclusion: 1. he did good ending. but, I think he didn't use the final ppt page.(maybe not) Transitions: 3. His pause was little bit disturbing my concentration. What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective? - speaking more loudly, I couldn't his voice well. What did you like about the presentation? - the well-made ppt was impressive to me.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Speaker: minyong Han Evaluator: Sunyoung Park 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? Socialism vs. Capitalism Is socialism bad? 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He told what he will be presenting before starting the speech. It would’ve been better to throw a question or whatever to make the audience curious. But when he asked what comes up to mind when looking at the images, it was great skill to hook the audiences interests. Succeeded! 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Breaking the stereotype of socialism, he stated why socialism is needed. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Restated why socialism is not bad and why capitalism needs socialism. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Was little bit monotonous but also paused before he brings important points. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Used enough body language. Wish there were more. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Um… his intonation and pronunciation was all clear. But I wish the camera man would shoot the video little bit closer to the presenter. Volume is low.
Speech Feedback
ReplyDeleteDate : 1/6, 2017
Evaluator: Sangwon Park
Speaker: Minyong Han
Assignment/Title : Minyong Han/Major/Thur 3-4
Speech Value: 1. His topic was interesting to me because people usually think socialism is the bad thing, but he said it is needed.
Preparation: 2. he sometimes use his paper, if he memorized it, I will give 1.
Organization: 1. He organized well the opening, body, and closer.
Opening: 1. He started with interesting ppt.
Body: 2. the content in his speech like contrast was good.
Conclusion: 1. he did good ending. but, I think he didn't use the final ppt page.(maybe not)
Transitions: 3. His pause was little bit disturbing my concentration.
What could the speaker have done differently to make the speech more effective?
- speaking more loudly, I couldn't his voice well.
What did you like about the presentation?
- the well-made ppt was impressive to me.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: minyong Han
Evaluator: Sunyoung Park
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Socialism vs. Capitalism
Is socialism bad?
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He told what he will be presenting before starting the speech. It would’ve been better to throw a question or whatever to make the audience curious.
But when he asked what comes up to mind when looking at the images, it was great skill to hook the audiences interests. Succeeded!
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Breaking the stereotype of socialism, he stated why socialism is needed.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Restated why socialism is not bad and why capitalism needs socialism.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Was little bit monotonous but also paused before he brings important points.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Used enough body language. Wish there were more.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Um… his intonation and pronunciation was all clear. But I wish the camera man would shoot the video little bit closer to the presenter. Volume is low.