Generic Presentation Evaluation Video: How to make Copi Luwak Evaluator: Juyeon Oh
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : His topic was about 'how to make Kopi Lwak'. He explained about the proces that goes into making the renowned coffee. At the end, he added his opinion about how aniamls should not be abused,
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : He questioned the audience about their favourite type of coffee. It was effective because it gave a hint to the audience about the speech topic, but also think of their own favourite.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : He had a logical structure, he explained the process step by step by explaining the process and the transtion was smooth because he used conjunctions such as first, second to pinpoint the specific stages.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : He had a concise and clear conclusion. Although he did not restate the main point, he said that as the origins of the luwak coffee is from the animal faeces, humans abuse their power and treat the animals in an inhumane way
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.: There was no humour, but he paced his speech well so that it wasn't too fast for the listeners. He used visual aids that clearly showed each step in the making process, which were helpful.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : He didn't move very much because he was standing behind the podium, but that did not matter too much. He had a good eye contact, and remained calm.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : The volume was good as he used a microphone. He enunciated and pronounced words clearly so that everything could be understood. It was a very interesting topic, which I learned more about Luwak coffee!
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Video : My great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to introduce some places for vacation. He suggested various places that had famous soccer stadiums, such as England, Spain, and Germany, and I think it was nicely organized. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, there was. He says “Are you interested in soccer”. I think it was effective, but it could have been better if it was a little longer. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? I believe the structure was logical as he was able to explain three specific places to support his idea. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? I think the closing part was memorable as he used a quote of a famous soccer player, but it would have been better if he had summarized his speech. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Yes, he did. He utilized a lot of pauses in his speech. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. His speech would have been better if he made more eye contact with the audience. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, the volume of his speech was clear and audible. I was able to understand everything in his speech.
Assignment/Title: A Great Vacation Idea Evaluator: Sanni Honkanen Speaker: Hyeonseok Nho Date: 2017-06-08
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker was suggesting a vacation trip for people who love soccer with different countries: England, Spain and Germany. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He could have had something visual, maybe to show how the stadiums looks like. There was a question in the beginning, “Are you interested in soccer?” which acted as a hook. The speech was also a bit short. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? I think the structure was well-organized and logical. He suggested three different places but they did not get mixed up, so good transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? He did not summarize in the end, but he told a quote of a famous soccer player so it made it memorable. But a short summarization in the conclusion would have been nice, as he had three different places he talked about. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, He had lot of pauses in his speech, which was good. Not visual aids, which would have been nice.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He could have used more gestures and more eye contact, maybe reading a bit too much from his notes. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Good volume and pronunciation, I understood everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jin, Hayeon Video: Unit 4: Let me explain 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speech was about ‘how to make Kopi Luwak’. He clearly explained the process of making the Kopi Luwak. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He started the speech with simple question, “do you like coffee?”. It made audience to wonder what he would speech next. It was effective. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. He explained by details the process of Kopi Luwak making. The transition was smooth. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? He called for action at the end that we should make health Kopi Luwak. It was memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? His visual aids were very powerful that I could fully understand what he was talking about as I saw the pictures of Kopi Luwak. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He did not use much gestures. However, his posture was stable. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. I could clearly understand what he was saying.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Speaker: Hyeonseok Nho Evaluator: Sunyoung Park Video: Icebreaker 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? 3 moments he wants to go back to in his life. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He started with the concept of very well known movie about time (Which I love so much) He mentioned the background knowledge that the main character can go back to the past as he wants for some viewer who might not know. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? 1. Childhood with grandparents 2. His puppy 딸기 came to his house for the first time. 3rd year in high school 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Concluded the speech with the lesson he wanted to give us, which is we cannot go back to the past so we have to live with our present His favorite word, Carpe diem really suits his entire speech. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, I love his speech because he did not hesitate to share his very personal stories and even more his feeling. It would’ve been hard to bring up that topics or stories, that is why his speech is attractive. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Wish he used rich body language more than that. His verbally delivered speech was really great, the content was amazing but it might have been boring because of monotonous body language. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Slow enough and clear enough
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: How to make Copi Luwak
Evaluator: Juyeon Oh
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? :
His topic was about 'how to make Kopi Lwak'. He explained about the proces that goes into making the renowned coffee. At the end, he added his opinion about how aniamls should not be abused,
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :
He questioned the audience about their favourite type of coffee. It was effective because it gave a hint to the audience about the speech topic, but also think of their own favourite.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :
He had a logical structure, he explained the process step by step by explaining the process and the transtion was smooth because he used conjunctions such as first, second to pinpoint the specific stages.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :
He had a concise and clear conclusion. Although he did not restate the main point, he said that as the origins of the luwak coffee is from the animal faeces, humans abuse their power and treat the animals in an inhumane way
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.:
There was no humour, but he paced his speech well so that it wasn't too fast for the listeners. He used visual aids that clearly showed each step in the making process, which were helpful.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. :
He didn't move very much because he was standing behind the podium, but that did not matter too much. He had a good eye contact, and remained calm.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? :
The volume was good as he used a microphone. He enunciated and pronounced words clearly so that everything could be understood. It was a very interesting topic, which I learned more about Luwak coffee!
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
ReplyDeleteVideo : My great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to introduce some places for vacation. He suggested various places that had famous soccer stadiums, such as England, Spain, and Germany, and I think it was nicely organized.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, there was. He says “Are you interested in soccer”. I think it was effective, but it could have been better if it was a little longer.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I believe the structure was logical as he was able to explain three specific places to support his idea.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I think the closing part was memorable as he used a quote of a famous soccer player, but it would have been better if he had summarized his speech.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Yes, he did. He utilized a lot of pauses in his speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His speech would have been better if he made more eye contact with the audience.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, the volume of his speech was clear and audible. I was able to understand everything in his speech.
Assignment/Title: A Great Vacation Idea
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Sanni Honkanen
Speaker: Hyeonseok Nho
Date: 2017-06-08
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speaker was suggesting a vacation trip for people who love soccer with different countries: England, Spain and Germany.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He could have had something visual, maybe to show how the stadiums looks like. There was a question in the beginning, “Are you interested in soccer?” which acted as a hook. The speech was also a bit short.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I think the structure was well-organized and logical. He suggested three different places but they did not get mixed up, so good transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He did not summarize in the end, but he told a quote of a famous soccer player so it made it memorable. But a short summarization in the conclusion would have been nice, as he had three different places he talked about.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He had lot of pauses in his speech, which was good. Not visual aids, which would have been nice.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He could have used more gestures and more eye contact, maybe reading a bit too much from his notes.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Good volume and pronunciation, I understood everything.
Goob job! :)
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jin, Hayeon
Video: Unit 4: Let me explain
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speech was about ‘how to make Kopi Luwak’. He clearly explained the process of making the Kopi Luwak.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He started the speech with simple question, “do you like coffee?”. It made audience to wonder what he would speech next. It was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. He explained by details the process of Kopi Luwak making. The transition was smooth.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He called for action at the end that we should make health Kopi Luwak. It was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
His visual aids were very powerful that I could fully understand what he was talking about as I saw the pictures of Kopi Luwak.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He did not use much gestures. However, his posture was stable.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. I could clearly understand what he was saying.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hyeonseok Nho
Evaluator: Sunyoung Park
Video: Icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
3 moments he wants to go back to in his life.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He started with the concept of very well known movie about time (Which I love so much)
He mentioned the background knowledge that the main character can go back to the past as he wants for some viewer who might not know.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
1. Childhood with grandparents
2. His puppy 딸기 came to his house for the first time.
3rd year in high school
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Concluded the speech with the lesson he wanted to give us, which is we cannot go back to the past so we have to live with our present
His favorite word, Carpe diem really suits his entire speech.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
I love his speech because he did not hesitate to share his very personal stories and even more his feeling. It would’ve been hard to bring up that topics or stories, that is why his speech is attractive.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Wish he used rich body language more than that. His verbally delivered speech was really great, the content was amazing but it might have been boring because of monotonous body language.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Slow enough and clear enough