Evaluator: Christina Woo Speaker: Joonhyung Kim Video: Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -It was about why Social Media sites are worthy. The speaker mentioned 3 reasons on why SNS works in a positive way. 1. They work as a bridge. 2. It has enabled people to be creative. 3. We are able to feel the sympathy of others. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -I think the hook part was the opening part where he right off shared with us about what he had uploaded on Instagram following by asking a question. It was very interesting and fresh. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes the structure was logical, well organized, and the transition was smooth. Yes, the speaker gave some examples but I would have supported the speech with one or two more specific examples or stories. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -The speaker stated a memorable conclusion. He summarized it well and I liked the last part where he encouraged the audience to use SNS in a positive way. I agreed to it and it made me look back at my own posts that I’d uploaded before. It was an uplifting speech. Thanks.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? - The speaker did not use visual aids, but it was a topic that all of us could relate to which made the speech fun and attention-grabbing. The pace was good and pauses were good too. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -The speaker had a good amount of body language. It wasn’t too much or too little. I think the eye contact was good too. However in some parts, the body gesture was awkward. For example in the conclusion, I think the gestures could have been less. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -The volume of the speech was very clear and audible to understand. I had no problem understanding the presentation. It was overall really great and fun to listen to! Thanks!!!
Date: 06/06/2017 Evaluator: Hayoung Lee Speaker: Joonhyung Kim Assignment Title: A Great Vacation Idea: Take a Rest in Hong Kong
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker recommends Hong Kong as a vacation spot. He talks about where Hong Kong is located, what Hong Kong is famous for, where his audience should visit, and the local food. Amusement Parks, Victoria Peak, shopping malls and the Rooftop Bar were his choices for the location. Dim Sum, dumplings, Dan Dan noodle were his pick for the local food.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, there was a hook. He asked his audience about how their winter vacations were, and continued by how well enjoyed his last winter vacation in Hong Kong.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was logical. From the opening to his main points and to conclusion, the transitions were good. His points were supported by his personal example and were thus strong.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? His conclusion was concise, but his main points were not quite summarized. The closing may have been better if his points were restated in a form such as going over the sites or food once again. Have a good day was memorable for me, though. :D
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? The speaker was really enthusiastic about his speech – it was evident in his tone and gestures. Mild humor was noticeable, which was great, and his visual aids well ‘aided’ his speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. His body language was impeccable – he had a great eye contact with his audience throughout the speech, and his posture and gestures were also great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was good, and his pronunciation was also great. Everything was well understood.
Thank you for sharing your speech with us, Joonhyung!
Generic Presentation Evaluation Assignment / Title: Unit 4 / 6 Ways to Relieve Stress Evaluator: Yohan Seo Speaker: Joonhyung Kim
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : To deal with our stress, there are 6 particular ways to relieve stress and he want to recommend them. It was addressed very well. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : He started with a question, “How are you in these days?” It attracted the audience’s attention, and was effective to lead into his topic. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : It was logical enough; opening with a question, 6 ways to relieve stress with specific details for the body, and conclusion with a laugh-provoking mention. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : It was, he concluded by hoping his presentation will be helpful. And he also hoped that the listeners have inner peace and feel free with their stress. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? : He used all of things, enthusiasm, pauses, humor, and helpful visual aids that make the audience easily understand what he wanted to talk. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : All of his body language was perfect, I think. He took a very formal and polite posture. Eye-contact was great. And gestures were also appropriate. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : His voice was loud and clear. I think, the place where he was speaking was a large room, so he should have spoken loudly and audibly, and it did work. I could understand all of what he said.
Evaluator : Sangwon Park speaker : Joonhyung Kim 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - He talked about how to relieve our stress. He suggested 6 measure for relieving stress in organized way. So, that was well addressed and clearly conveyed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - Yes, he firstly said that we usually keep our stress in mind. But, after that, he also said we don’t need to keep that. I think that is the hook part because the contrast has an effect when we do speech. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - Yes, He spoked the method which relieve our stress in this order : write a diary, listen to music, doing exercise, go travel, shop for stuff, eat your favourite foods. That numerical order helped me understand easily. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - The conclusion was concise. He ended with his wish that the speech would be helpful for us. But, if he summarized his speech, it will be more memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, - Yes, he did. He used various visual aids, and did adequate pauses between measures he suggested. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - His gesture, eye contact, and so on... were very natural and cool! Even he seemed like professional speaker. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - Yes, the volume was good to listen the speech. Therefore, I could understand everything he spoke.
Evaluator: Christina Woo
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Joonhyung Kim
Video: Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-It was about why Social Media sites are worthy. The speaker mentioned 3 reasons on why SNS works in a positive way. 1. They work as a bridge. 2. It has enabled people to be creative. 3. We are able to feel the sympathy of others.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think the hook part was the opening part where he right off shared with us about what he had uploaded on Instagram following by asking a question. It was very interesting and fresh.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes the structure was logical, well organized, and the transition was smooth. Yes, the speaker gave some examples but I would have supported the speech with one or two more specific examples or stories.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-The speaker stated a memorable conclusion. He summarized it well and I liked the last part where he encouraged the audience to use SNS in a positive way. I agreed to it and it made me look back at my own posts that I’d uploaded before. It was an uplifting speech. Thanks.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
- The speaker did not use visual aids, but it was a topic that all of us could relate to which made the speech fun and attention-grabbing. The pace was good and pauses were good too.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-The speaker had a good amount of body language. It wasn’t too much or too little. I think the eye contact was good too. However in some parts, the body gesture was awkward. For example in the conclusion, I think the gestures could have been less.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The volume of the speech was very clear and audible to understand. I had no problem understanding the presentation. It was overall really great and fun to listen to! Thanks!!!
Date: 06/06/2017
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hayoung Lee
Speaker: Joonhyung Kim
Assignment Title: A Great Vacation Idea: Take a Rest in Hong Kong
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speaker recommends Hong Kong as a vacation spot. He talks about where Hong Kong is located, what Hong Kong is famous for, where his audience should visit, and the local food. Amusement Parks, Victoria Peak, shopping malls and the Rooftop Bar were his choices for the location. Dim Sum, dumplings, Dan Dan noodle were his pick for the local food.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, there was a hook. He asked his audience about how their winter vacations were, and continued by how well enjoyed his last winter vacation in Hong Kong.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical. From the opening to his main points and to conclusion, the transitions were good. His points were supported by his personal example and were thus strong.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
His conclusion was concise, but his main points were not quite summarized. The closing may have been better if his points were restated in a form such as going over the sites or food once again. Have a good day was memorable for me, though. :D
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
The speaker was really enthusiastic about his speech – it was evident in his tone and gestures. Mild humor was noticeable, which was great, and his visual aids well ‘aided’ his speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His body language was impeccable – he had a great eye contact with his audience throughout the speech, and his posture and gestures were also great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good, and his pronunciation was also great. Everything was well understood.
Thank you for sharing your speech with us, Joonhyung!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteAssignment / Title: Unit 4 / 6 Ways to Relieve Stress
Evaluator: Yohan Seo
Speaker: Joonhyung Kim
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
: To deal with our stress, there are 6 particular ways to relieve stress and he want to recommend them. It was addressed very well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
: He started with a question, “How are you in these days?” It attracted the audience’s attention, and was effective to lead into his topic.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
: It was logical enough; opening with a question, 6 ways to relieve stress with specific details for the body, and conclusion with a laugh-provoking mention.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
: It was, he concluded by hoping his presentation will be helpful. And he also hoped that the listeners have inner peace and feel free with their stress.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
: He used all of things, enthusiasm, pauses, humor, and helpful visual aids that make the audience easily understand what he wanted to talk.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
: All of his body language was perfect, I think. He took a very formal and polite posture. Eye-contact was great. And gestures were also appropriate.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
: His voice was loud and clear. I think, the place where he was speaking was a large room, so he should have spoken loudly and audibly, and it did work. I could understand all of what he said.
Thank you for your perfect presentation.:)
Evaluator : Sangwon Park
ReplyDeletespeaker : Joonhyung Kim
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- He talked about how to relieve our stress. He suggested 6 measure for relieving stress in organized way. So, that was well addressed and clearly conveyed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- Yes, he firstly said that we usually keep our stress in mind. But, after that, he also said we don’t need to keep that. I think that is the hook part because the contrast has an effect when we do speech.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Yes, He spoked the method which relieve our stress in this order : write a diary, listen to music, doing exercise, go travel, shop for stuff, eat your favourite foods. That numerical order helped me understand easily.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- The conclusion was concise. He ended with his wish that the speech would be helpful for us. But, if he summarized his speech, it will be more memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- Yes, he did. He used various visual aids, and did adequate pauses between measures he suggested.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- His gesture, eye contact, and so on... were very natural and cool! Even he seemed like professional speaker.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Yes, the volume was good to listen the speech. Therefore, I could understand everything he spoke.