Generic Presentation Evaluation Video: Vacation idea
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : He was talking about Venice, city in Italy and why should everyone visit that city. He told what is famous in Venice; bridges, canals, condoles and lights at the night time. He also suggested what to see in Venice (museums etc.) and where to stay (guesthouse for example)
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : Beginning was kinda hooking and good it was effective and it made me wanna listen more. Maybe he could have made it even more effective by using more powerful voice tone and gestures.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : It was logical, there was clear parts he were talking about. Like famous things, sightseeing and accommodation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Closing was good. It was good for this kind of subject. He suggested us to visit there if we found his speech and what he told interesting.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : He could have use some visual aids like photos. It would have make it even more interesting.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : He was holding a paper in his hands which make him just stand still mostly. He couldn't use his hands and that's why there is a lack of gestures and eye contact at times.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Voice tone was sometimes bit too quiet and unclear. But he was calm and made pauses which was good. Some words were a bit unclear also but i could understood them when he explained about things more.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyunseo Jung Speaker: minyong han Assignment/Title : icebreaker 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? his speech was about how he started to study English. by detailed examples and explanation, it was really well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? his introduction caught the attention. So I think It was effective. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? he analyzed detailed experience. So the composition of his speech was really logical. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? For the conclusion he talked about how he feels about his achievement. But it would be better if there was more contents for the conclusion. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? he used appropriate pauses, so it made me easy to understand. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. his eye contact was natural. When explaining his experience, he used adequate actions so that the process was visualized. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? sure. his speech was really clear so it was easy to understand most of his ideas.
Evaluator: Bochra El Ghali Speaker: Minyong Han Video: Vacation plan
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : The speech was about the northern part of Italy “Venice” Venice is a well-known place by its canals, bridge and the beauty of its architecture. So he was introducing the place and showing the reasons in order to spend a vacation there.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : The hook was acceptable and clear but it would be much better if he could make it catchier by using a magical words to make the beginning more effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : The transition was clear and understandable. Provided examples were in point but I recommend if he could work more on transitions. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : He end up by suggesting or other words recommending us to visit Venice. The conclusion was pretty good
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : He could show some pictures of the recommended place or even provide ppt. Because describing the place only still not effective to make the audience more interested.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Because he was reading from the script all the time. Handling the paper prevent him using the eye contact and even the body language. I recommend him using cards next time.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : . I recommend him to work more on his pronunciation and before every presentation he could find those words that new to him and check the right pronunciation. The sounds was sometimes not clear but still good .The overall was so nice. Good luck !
Evaluator: MinJee Kim Video: City I want to visit 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? It was about the city that he wants to visit, which was Venice. It was well stated.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He gave us a question. It would have been better if he gave us a bit more time to think about the answer.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was well structured and logical. It had plenty of good reasons and details to back up his reason.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? It was concise and it summarized the main points.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? He was very formal.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He had good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? He spoke with clarity, but his voice was too small. I could barely understand it.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Vacation idea
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : He was talking about Venice, city in Italy and why should everyone visit that city. He told what is famous in Venice; bridges, canals, condoles and lights at the night time. He also suggested what to see in Venice (museums etc.) and where to stay (guesthouse for example)
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : Beginning was kinda hooking and good it was effective and it made me wanna listen more. Maybe he could have made it even more effective by using more powerful voice tone and gestures.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : It was logical, there was clear parts he were talking about. Like famous things, sightseeing and accommodation.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Closing was good. It was good for this kind of subject. He suggested us to visit there if we found his speech and what he told interesting.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : He could have use some visual aids like photos. It would have make it even more interesting.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : He was holding a paper in his hands which make him just stand still mostly. He couldn't use his hands and that's why there is a lack of gestures and eye contact at times.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Voice tone was sometimes bit too quiet and unclear. But he was calm and made pauses which was good. Some words were a bit unclear also but i could understood them when he explained about things more.
Great speech overall.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyunseo Jung
Speaker: minyong han
Assignment/Title : icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
his speech was about how he started to study English. by detailed examples and explanation, it was really well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
his introduction caught the attention. So I think It was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
he analyzed detailed experience. So the composition of his speech was really logical.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
For the conclusion he talked about how he feels about his achievement. But it would be better if there was more contents for the conclusion.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
he used appropriate pauses, so it made me easy to understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
his eye contact was natural. When explaining his experience, he used adequate actions so that the process was visualized.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
sure. his speech was really clear so it was easy to understand most of his ideas.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Bochra El Ghali
Speaker: Minyong Han
Video: Vacation plan
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? :
The speech was about the northern part of Italy “Venice”
Venice is a well-known place by its canals, bridge and the beauty of its architecture. So he was introducing the place and showing the reasons in order to spend a vacation there.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :
The hook was acceptable and clear but it would be much better if he could make it catchier by using a magical words to make the beginning more effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :
The transition was clear and understandable. Provided examples were in point but I recommend if he could work more on transitions.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :
He end up by suggesting or other words recommending us to visit Venice. The conclusion was pretty good
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. :
He could show some pictures of the recommended place or even provide ppt. Because describing the place only still not effective to make the audience more interested.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Because he was reading from the script all the time. Handling the paper prevent him using the eye contact and even the body language. I recommend him using cards next time.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? :
. I recommend him to work more on his pronunciation and before every presentation he could find those words that new to him and check the right pronunciation.
The sounds was sometimes not clear but still good .The overall was so nice. Good luck !
Evaluator: MinJee Kim
ReplyDeleteVideo: City I want to visit
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
It was about the city that he wants to visit, which was Venice. It was well stated.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He gave us a question. It would have been better if he gave us a bit more time to think about the answer.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was well structured and logical. It had plenty of good reasons and details to back up his reason.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
It was concise and it summarized the main points.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
He was very formal.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He had good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
He spoke with clarity, but his voice was too small. I could barely understand it.