Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyowon Yun Evaluated video: Second Major Assignment
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to tell people that it's not really that important to have a dream job and break the general mold that people have in their mind. The main point of her speech was that society is pressuring people to have an exact dream but it's not that important to do so. The main point was very well addressed with various examples and personal experiences.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? The hook was in the beginning of the speech when the speaker read a quote related to the topic from the script. It was interesting enough to attract readers' attention, but I think it could be improved by you pausing for a few seconds after explaining the quote. You need to give some time for the audience to understand it.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was logical and I liked how to gave enough evidence and examples such as types of dreams and your personal experiences provided. The transitions between ideas was clear so I could see that you were very clear on which direction you're going with your speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Your conclusion was clear and straightforwarded. The final statement of your speech was spoken directly to the audience. The closing was memorable and clear enough to answer "so what?" question.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? I am honestly not sure if you are enthusiastic when giving the speech because you didn't smile or looked excited at all. You didn't use any pauses, so the speech was kind of hurriedly progressing. No particular humor was given. You tried to use some visual aids, but honestly, I couldn't quite see the exact context since the words were small and the screen was too bright and small.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. You didn't use any significant body language, instead you seemed frozen with nervousness so try to relax next time. Your posture was okay, standing straight. You've made some good eye contacts.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was good enough. You enunciated words clearly so I could understand your overall context although I am not very familiar with british accent. Your accent is very attractive by the way :) Nice job with your speech!! :)_
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jin, Hayeon Video: Unit 4 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The purpose of the speech is to explain the process of paper making. She clearly explained the procedure of paper production. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She started her speech with a question that grasped the attention of the audience. It was effective. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was very logical that she explained by details the process of paper production. Her transition was smooth as well. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. She concluded by sharing her opinion why she chose to speak about paper production. It was memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Although there were no humor and visual aids, her pauses and enthusiasm were powerful enough to grasp the attention of audience. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She did not use much gestures. However, her eye contact was very stable. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. I could easily follow what she was saying because her pronunciation was very clear and the volume was good.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jang Hajong Evaluated video: The person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She talked about the person who she admire. She`s role model is timothy Williams. It was good.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I think it was not clear to understand. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. It was logical to understand. There are great evidences and examples. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. The conclusion restated well. I could remember easily. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? good. But if she use pause more and think about speed, listeners can understand more easily.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. I think that body language is needed
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? yes. But speed is little fast. So it is needed to be controlled. But this presentation is so great to inform something.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Wooseong Kim Video: Unit 4 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to inform audiences of how to make paper. It was organized well. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There’s no hook. If she had added hook to attract audiences’ attention, the speech would have been better. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? There’s nothing unlogical for her speech as she’s talking about the process for making paper. She helped audiences’ understanding by numbering each processes. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Conclusion was concise as she emphasized the importance of paper. It was memorable because paper is our daily necessity. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, There’s no visual aids, pauses, humor, but she showed amazing enthusiasm in her speech. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She spoke with her body somewhat stiffen. She tried to make lots of eye contacts with audiences. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Volume was enough. She enunciated clearly so that I could understand overall speech.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyowon Yun
Evaluated video: Second Major Assignment
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to tell people that it's not really that important to have a dream job and break the general mold that people have in their mind. The main point of her speech was that society is pressuring people to have an exact dream but it's not that important to do so. The main point was very well addressed with various examples and personal experiences.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The hook was in the beginning of the speech when the speaker read a quote related to the topic from the script. It was interesting enough to attract readers' attention, but I think it could be improved by you pausing for a few seconds after explaining the quote. You need to give some time for the audience to understand it.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was logical and I liked how to gave enough evidence and examples such as types of dreams and your personal experiences provided. The transitions between ideas was clear so I could see that you were very clear on which direction you're going with your speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Your conclusion was clear and straightforwarded. The final statement of your speech was spoken directly to the audience. The closing was memorable and clear enough to answer "so what?" question.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
I am honestly not sure if you are enthusiastic when giving the speech because you didn't smile or looked excited at all. You didn't use any pauses, so the speech was kind of hurriedly progressing. No particular humor was given. You tried to use some visual aids, but honestly, I couldn't quite see the exact context since the words were small and the screen was too bright and small.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
You didn't use any significant body language, instead you seemed frozen with nervousness so try to relax next time. Your posture was okay, standing straight. You've made some good eye contacts.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good enough. You enunciated words clearly so I could understand your overall context although I am not very familiar with british accent. Your accent is very attractive by the way :) Nice job with your speech!! :)_
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jin, Hayeon
Video: Unit 4
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The purpose of the speech is to explain the process of paper making. She clearly explained the procedure of paper production.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She started her speech with a question that grasped the attention of the audience. It was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was very logical that she explained by details the process of paper production. Her transition was smooth as well.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. She concluded by sharing her opinion why she chose to speak about paper production. It was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Although there were no humor and visual aids, her pauses and enthusiasm were powerful enough to grasp the attention of audience.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She did not use much gestures. However, her eye contact was very stable.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. I could easily follow what she was saying because her pronunciation was very clear and the volume was good.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jang Hajong
Evaluated video: The person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She talked about the person who she admire. She`s role model is timothy Williams. It was good.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think it was not clear to understand.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. It was logical to understand. There are great evidences and examples.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. The conclusion restated well. I could remember easily.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
good. But if she use pause more and think about speed, listeners can understand more easily.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
I think that body language is needed
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
yes. But speed is little fast. So it is needed to be controlled. But this presentation is so great to inform something.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Wooseong Kim
Video: Unit 4
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to inform audiences of how to make paper. It was organized well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There’s no hook. If she had added hook to attract audiences’ attention, the speech would have been better.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
There’s nothing unlogical for her speech as she’s talking about the process for making paper. She helped audiences’ understanding by numbering each processes.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Conclusion was concise as she emphasized the importance of paper. It was memorable because paper is our daily necessity.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
There’s no visual aids, pauses, humor, but she showed amazing enthusiasm in her speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She spoke with her body somewhat stiffen. She tried to make lots of eye contacts with audiences.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Volume was enough. She enunciated clearly so that I could understand overall speech.