Generic Presentation Evaluation Video: Unit 4, 3 steps to get a certification on tourism interpreter Date : Wed 7 Jun Evaluator: Minyong Han
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : The main point was to introduce the 3 steps required to become a tourism interpreter. I think it was addressed quite well, because she stuck to the point.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : I am not sure if there was a hook. I'm certain that she could have caught my attention with more interesting things about becoming a tourism interpreter.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Her structure was logical in that she introduced how to become a tourism interpreter step by step. However, she didn't provide any examples. Transitions were good between ideas, though.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Her conclusion was pretty concise, and she included all the main points. So, I liked the closing.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.: I have no idea if she used pauses or humor, but it's positive that she used enthusiasm and visual aids. I could feel the enthusiasm that she really wanted to be a tourism interpreter.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : There were some simple hand movements, and she was definitely still. She held her stare at the camera the whole time.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : She was audible, but it is not good that I had to try to listen to her. Still, she was clear, and I could understand her very well.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Video : 3 steps to get a certification
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to explain how to get a certification to be a tourism interpretation guide. In this presentation, she talks about the 3 steps to become a tourism interpretation guide. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She talks about her life motto, “You only live once”. I believe that it was able to grab the audiences’ attention easily. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? I believe the steps that she explained in her speech was able to explain the processes for becoming a guide clearly. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She ends her presentation by saying that she will work hard to go through these three steps, and I think it was concise. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, She did have a lot of pauses in her speech, and it helped her to explain her processes. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She had strong eye contact with the audience, but it would have been better if she used a little more body language. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Her voice was clear, but it would have been better if her voice was a little louder.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyobin Jeon Video: Unit2 a great vacation idea 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She introduced Turkey as the place she wants to go most. There are 3 cities of Turkey suggested by her. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She started her speech by suggesting special quiz which consists of facsinating things of Turkey. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, it was. I was persuaded why she introduced Turkey as an attractive place. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She did not summarize or restate her speech, but she mentioned some more information about Turkey. I think it was effective. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She looked very confident in her video. Also, she used some pauses properly. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her eye contact with audiences was very good, and also her gestures were good. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Volume of her speech was very perfect. And her pronounciation was also good.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Unit 4, 3 steps to get a certification on tourism interpreter
Date : Wed 7 Jun
Evaluator: Minyong Han
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? :
The main point was to introduce the 3 steps required to become a tourism interpreter. I think it was addressed quite well, because she stuck to the point.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :
I am not sure if there was a hook. I'm certain that she could have caught my attention with more interesting things about becoming a tourism interpreter.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :
Her structure was logical in that she introduced how to become a tourism interpreter step by step. However, she didn't provide any examples. Transitions were good between ideas, though.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :
Her conclusion was pretty concise, and she included all the main points. So, I liked the closing.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.:
I have no idea if she used pauses or humor, but it's positive that she used enthusiasm and visual aids. I could feel the enthusiasm that she really wanted to be a tourism interpreter.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. :
There were some simple hand movements, and she was definitely still. She held her stare at the camera the whole time.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? :
She was audible, but it is not good that I had to try to listen to her. Still, she was clear, and I could understand her very well.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
ReplyDeleteVideo : 3 steps to get a certification
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to explain how to get a certification to be a tourism interpretation guide. In this presentation, she talks about the 3 steps to become a tourism interpretation guide.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She talks about her life motto, “You only live once”. I believe that it was able to grab the audiences’ attention easily.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I believe the steps that she explained in her speech was able to explain the processes for becoming a guide clearly.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She ends her presentation by saying that she will work hard to go through these three steps, and I think it was concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She did have a lot of pauses in her speech, and it helped her to explain her processes.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She had strong eye contact with the audience, but it would have been better if she used a little more body language.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Her voice was clear, but it would have been better if her voice was a little louder.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyobin Jeon
Video: Unit2 a great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She introduced Turkey as the place she wants to go most. There are 3 cities of Turkey suggested by her.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She started her speech by suggesting special quiz which consists of facsinating things of Turkey.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was. I was persuaded why she introduced Turkey as an attractive place.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She did not summarize or restate her speech, but she mentioned some more information about Turkey. I think it was effective.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She looked very confident in her video. Also, she used some pauses properly.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her eye contact with audiences was very good, and also her gestures were good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Volume of her speech was very perfect. And her pronounciation was also good.