Friday, June 2, 2017

Jeonghaeng Lee/ 5 Links/ Thursday 3-4

1. https://youtu.be/Vx7yQnwEOHE

Hope you like them!

4 comments:

  1. Generic Presentation Evaluation
    Evaluator: Na Yeon Lim
    Speaker: Jeonghang Lee
    Assignment/Title : Unit 5
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    He tried to convey his opinion on why students should wear school uniforms. He mentioned its merits in his point of view.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes, he started with mentioned about the concept of diversity.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes, I learned from watching his video that his usages of transitions and elaboration was very adept.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    He emphasized why students should wear school uniforms once again in his conclusion. It was good.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    It would be more likely that he did not use visual aids, however his use of adequate pauses and gestures did not make the speech monotonous.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    Good. It could have been better if he had memorized more. However, his natural usages of gestures and eye contact was good.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Yes, his pronunciation was very clear and easy to follow along.


    ReplyDelete
  2. Evaluator: Sumin Park
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    The overall purpose of the speech was to show his opinion that students should wear uniforms to school.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    It was very effective because he started his speech mentioning diversity.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    The structure was logical because 3 main reasons supported his opinion clearly. His speech was well organized by dividing his speech introduction, body and conclusion. And transitions that he used when he moved to other part of the speech was great.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    The closing was memorable because he told the audience to tell their siblings about 3 main reasons that he suggested when their siblings complain about wearing uniforms.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    Yes, he used enthusiasm, pauses, visual aids perfectly.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    His eye contact toward audience was great and I liked the way he used gestures well and naturally while he was delivering his speech.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    The volume was good. And he enunciate and pronounce clearly so that everything could be understood.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Evaluator : Sangwon Park
    speaker :  Jeonghang Lee
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - He argued that students should wear school uniforms for three reasons like helping studying, preventing bully, distinguishing. And he added first, second, third order, so that was really addressed.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - Yes, there was a hook. He used hook when he turned his topic “diversity”.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - Yes, his speech had a numerical order. That helped me understand easily. And he used pause before he said ‘however’. That made me concentrate his speech.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - Yes, the conclusion was concise. He suggested the example in our life like what we tell when our sibling complained.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, - Yes, his visual aids was helpful for understanding. I said above, he also used pauses when he wanted to turn his subject effectively.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - His eye contact was natural and nice. His posture was also great.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - Yes, that was adequate to hear and clear to understand.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Generic Presentation Evaluation
    Evaluator: Wooseong Kim
    Speaker: Jeong haeng Lee
    Assignment/Title : Unit 5
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    The overall purpose of the speech was to express his opinion about wearing school uniform. It was organized well.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    ‘However’ was his hook. By having some pauses, and saying “however” he totally succeeded in getting audiences’ attention.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    His structure was very strong and logical. He supported his opinion with logical evidences. Transitions were also great.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Conclusion was concise. The main point was restated and it was very memorable.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
    He used pauses, visual aids, humors very well. He also showed amazing enthusiasm.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    He used lots of hand gestures and they made audiences comfortable psychologically. Eye contact was also great.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Volume was enough. She enunciated very well. I could understand everything in her speech.

    ReplyDelete