1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? I think you were keeping in mind that you need to answer "so what?" question, but I still don't get the eventual purpose of you delivering this speech. The speech was very interesting, dealing with finding what you truly like such as working at the airport and deeply contemplating about your future job. I think your emotions and thoughts were very well addressed with your facial expressions and active tone-changing but it would have been better if you had delivered a particular lesson to the audience at the end of the speech.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I think the hook was in the very beginning of the speech when you asked a question about the helsinki airport to the audience. It was effective because in my case, you've surprised me that such a variety of contents can be delivered through speech in a fun way. I think there's no other improvement to be made to your hook!
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was very nice that you had some good numbers such the number of passengers or seats. Also you've gave some examples of how you've drank coffee with the captian and officers and your daily work at the helsinki airport. But I haven't actually gotten the exact structure of your speech, because the division between each part was ambiguous.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was quite clear, that you wanted to share a good job of yours and your experience in that job. But the points that you've mentioned before were not restated and it seemed like you kind of wrapped up your speech in a quick time,, so it wasn't that memorable but normal ending.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? I could feel that you were very happy when delivering this speech because you are satisfied with your experience in the helsinki airport. You used some good pauses for the audience to reconsider your remarks. You laughed a little bit between few lines so you relaxed your audience. No visual aids used.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. You've made some good hand jestures, but I think it would have been better if you had stood more straight with your both legs straight. You've made good eye contacts and facial expressions :)
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was just adequate, but I couldn't hear few words you've said because the audience kind of fuzzed.. I'm not sure if it is the problem with your camera or the youtube. Since I'm not really used to the pronunciation of yours, it was kind of hard for me to understand few lines, but overall I had no significant problem! Nice job!!
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyobin Jeon Video: Unit1 a person I admire 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She introduces a certain person who she admires most and explained some specific reasons why she admires this person most. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She started her speech by introducing the person she admires and his special things. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, it was. I was persuaded why she admire this person most in her life. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She did not summarize or restate her speech. If she add some information at the end of her speech, it would be much better than before. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She used her own keyword notes, and these notes really seem to help her a lot. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her eye contact with audiences was very good, but I think that she needs more body gestures. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Volume of his speech was perfect and I can clearly hear what he said. It was very excellent.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyowon Yun
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
I think you were keeping in mind that you need to answer "so what?" question, but I still don't get the eventual purpose of you delivering this speech. The speech was very interesting, dealing with finding what you truly like such as working at the airport and deeply contemplating about your future job. I think your emotions and thoughts were very well addressed with your facial expressions and active tone-changing but it would have been better if you had delivered a particular lesson to the audience at the end of the speech.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think the hook was in the very beginning of the speech when you asked a question about the helsinki airport to the audience. It was effective because in my case, you've surprised me that such a variety of contents can be delivered through speech in a fun way. I think there's no other improvement to be made to your hook!
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was very nice that you had some good numbers such the number of passengers or seats. Also you've gave some examples of how you've drank coffee with the captian and officers and your daily work at the helsinki airport. But I haven't actually gotten the exact structure of your speech, because the division between each part was ambiguous.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was quite clear, that you wanted to share a good job of yours and your experience in that job. But the points that you've mentioned before were not restated and it seemed like you kind of wrapped up your speech in a quick time,, so it wasn't that memorable but normal ending.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
I could feel that you were very happy when delivering this speech because you are satisfied with your experience in the helsinki airport. You used some good pauses for the audience to reconsider your remarks. You laughed a little bit between few lines so you relaxed your audience. No visual aids used.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
You've made some good hand jestures, but I think it would have been better if you had stood more straight with your both legs straight. You've made good eye contacts and facial expressions :)
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was just adequate, but I couldn't hear few words you've said because the audience kind of fuzzed.. I'm not sure if it is the problem with your camera or the youtube. Since I'm not really used to the pronunciation of yours, it was kind of hard for me to understand few lines, but overall I had no significant problem! Nice job!!
I gave comment on your "Major Assignment 2"!!
DeleteForgot to mention :)
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyobin Jeon
Video: Unit1 a person I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She introduces a certain person who she admires most and explained some specific reasons why she admires this person most.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She started her speech by introducing the person she admires and his special things.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was. I was persuaded why she admire this person most in her life.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She did not summarize or restate her speech. If she add some information at the end of her speech, it would be much better than before.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She used her own keyword notes, and these notes really seem to help her a lot.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her eye contact with audiences was very good, but I think that she needs more body gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Volume of his speech was perfect and I can clearly hear what he said. It was very excellent.