1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to inform the audience the process of digestions by analyzing total of 4 procedures. I liked how you organized your speech into intro, 4 body parts and conclusion. It was very well addressed and clear :)
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? The hook was at the very beginning of the speech when you asked you audience a particular question. It was very effective because even though one of your audience actually answered your question, You've given enough time for them to think about the answer, so nice pausing :) No improvement to be made!
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was very logical. Your main points were divided into 4 points and each stage was described thoroughly and interestingly. Good transitions were made between each stages. Specific evidence was not given in your speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was very concise and clear with you restating all the procedures of digestions previously mentioned. The audience might have forgotten some of your points but was very clearly reminded by your summary at the end. Therefore your conclusion was memorable :)
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? You seemed excited to give a speech, but you could have smiled more often since you seemed frozen a little bit with nervousness. You used some great pauses so it was very nice :) No particular humor or visual aids provided.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. You stood straight in good posture, but next time try using more active body movements. You've made some good eye contacts with your listeners so they could focus more on your speech! :)
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was good and loud enough. You've enunciated words clearly with nice pronunciation. I had no problem understanding the overall context of your speech! Nice job and I see you making huge improvements! :)
Evaluator: MinJee Kim 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? It was well introduced, and well organized overall.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He asked a question to arouse the interest. It was great.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was logical and well supported. The process was great.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was well stated and concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? He had great pauses.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He had great gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? He spoke with clarity and good volume.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyowon Yun
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to inform the audience the process of digestions by analyzing total of 4 procedures. I liked how you organized your speech into intro, 4 body parts and conclusion. It was very well addressed and clear :)
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The hook was at the very beginning of the speech when you asked you audience a particular question. It was very effective because even though one of your audience actually answered your question, You've given enough time for them to think about the answer, so nice pausing :) No improvement to be made!
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was very logical. Your main points were divided into 4 points and each stage was described thoroughly and interestingly. Good transitions were made between each stages. Specific evidence was not given in your speech.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was very concise and clear with you restating all the procedures of digestions previously mentioned. The audience might have forgotten some of your points but was very clearly reminded by your summary at the end. Therefore your conclusion was memorable :)
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
You seemed excited to give a speech, but you could have smiled more often since you seemed frozen a little bit with nervousness. You used some great pauses so it was very nice :) No particular humor or visual aids provided.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
You stood straight in good posture, but next time try using more active body movements. You've made some good eye contacts with your listeners so they could focus more on your speech! :)
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good and loud enough. You've enunciated words clearly with nice pronunciation. I had no problem understanding the overall context of your speech! Nice job and I see you making huge improvements! :)
Evaluator: MinJee Kim
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
It was well introduced, and well organized overall.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He asked a question to arouse the interest. It was great.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was logical and well supported. The process was great.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was well stated and concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
He had great pauses.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He had great gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
He spoke with clarity and good volume.