Tuesday, June 6, 2017

Jaehee Chung / video links / Thurs.3-4

Unit 1. A Person I Admire

Unit 2. A Great Vacation Idea

Major Assignment 1. The Icebreaker

Unit 4. Let me explain

Unit 5. In My Opinion

Major Assignment 2. 

5 comments:

  1. Feedback for unit 4

    Evaluator: Hyeonseok Nho

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    She explained how to make Bingsu at home without Bingsu machine. I think audiences can fully understand her content well.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    I was impressed that she was trying to communicate with the viewer. It could be better if she chose more bright place to shooting.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    She well arranged the process of making Bingsu without machine. She used good transition between the process of making Bingsu.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    She encouraged to make ice Bingsu and finished her presentation. This made me want to make Bingsu.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.
    She didn’t use humor or visual aids. It could be better if she use power point or pictures to make it easier to understand.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    He didn't move very much but that did not matter too much. And She had many eye contact with video shooter.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Her voice was clearly and audibly enough to hear presentation. And the volume of her voice is enough too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Generic Presentation Evaluation
    Evaluator: Jeeny Jung
    Date: 6/8
    Presentation: Unit 4
    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    Her speech is about how to make a summer dessert Bingsoo at home.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    Yes. She started by talking with the weather which is related to her topic Bingsoo(a summer dessert). And I think that there is nothing to be improved since it was a catching hook.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    Yes. She introduces the process step by step and suggests substitutes also.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Yes. She restated her main topic by asking why don’t you try making bingsoo at home which let me think about the topic one more time.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    Yes. She showed enthusiasm by using pauses and changing tones on some words.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    She makes good eye contact by avoiding looking and just reading her notes which was great.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Yes. Her tone, volume and pronunciation was very good for me to understand her whole speech.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Assignment/Title: A Great Vacation Idea
    Evaluator: Sanni Honkanen
    Speaker: Jaehee Chung
    Date: 2017-06-08

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    She introduced San Francisco as a great vacation idea. She shared some great destinations to visit, such as Napa Valley Winery.
    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    She started with a question if we had heard a song called “I left my heart in San Francisco”. She could have had something visual to show us the sights she was talking about.
    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    The structure was well-organized, she suggested many places to visit in SF.
    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    She could have summarized her speech in the end, she suggested to visit her Instagram for some travel photos of SF.
    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    She did not use visual aids, which would have been nice. I got the idea that she has visited SF before, so her own travel photos would have been great.
    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    Good eye contact, I did not see her gestures that well as the laptop was on the way.
    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    She talked with a good volume and had clear pronunciation, even though the person who filmed her was pretty far away.
    Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Speaker : Jaehee Chung
    Evaluator : Hyunjin Song
    Title : In my opinion

    1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
    She talked about the animal testing. She had 2reasons for opposing animal testing and the speech was delivered well

    2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
    It was very effective. Her argument was logical and she seemed confident in her saying. It was impressive.

    3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
    The structure was very logical. She told us 2 reasons for her argument and there were also some evidences and examples.

    4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
    Yes. She emphasized her argument again in the conclusion part and it was concise.

    5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
    She used pauses in the speech and she seemed confident. The speech was really good.

    6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
    She tried to make an eye contact in the whole speech. Also her posture was good.

    7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
    Her volume was good and she talked clearly so it was good to hear. I can understand her speech very well.

    ReplyDelete