Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Na Yeon Lim Speaker: Janita Wallin Assignment/Title : A Great Vacation Idea 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall speech was about ‘Finland,’ which could be a beautiful place to travel if you love winter sports and winter. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, she started with asking questions are you interested in winter sports. It was effective for audiences to start guessing the place she will introduce. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? She had lots of examples and evidences that came from her personal experiences. I believe there could have been more transitions though. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? I believe it could have been better with more details. Still, it was memorable because she ended with saying “Yay!” That made me feel like I wanted to visit Finland even more. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She had enthusiasm that was obvious throughout her speech. . 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her eye contact was good. I felt like she was talking to me one on one. Also, her gestures were natural. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, her speech was easy to follow along and understand thanks to her clear pronunciation.
Evaluator: Sumin Park 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to recommend perfect place for vacation. And she recommended her hometown, Finland. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? It was effective that she told audience based on her past experiences. Also she suggested Finland could be the best vacation place if audiences like winter sports or northern lights, aurora. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? She first started her speech by asking audiences if they are interested in winter sports or just chilling out in the place where it just looks like winter wonderland. And then she began to talk about the reasons why Finland would be the best place for vacation. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She restated the main points that she mentioned earlier in her speech. And the closing was memorable because she concluded by emphasizing on new things that audience can do when they visit Finland. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Yes, the speaker use enthusiasm and pauses while delivering her speech. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her eye contact toward the audience was great and her gestures were natural. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was great and she pronounced clearly so that every word could be understood perfectly.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jeeny Jung Date: 6/8 Presentation: Unit 5 My Opinion 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She think it isn’t right to have gender roles nowadays. People shouldn’t force others to act in some way based on gender roles. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. She started by saying that in the modern society which is 2017, there is no thing such as gender roles. It might have been better if she had said that it is different from the past at the front. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. She made an example by suggesting her childhood which was about taking photos in blue frames and pink frames as a child and said that she thinks it’s wrong. This helped me to understand her opinion. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Partly. She said that this is the reason why I oppose on gender roles, but she didn’t summarize her reasons. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Yes. She used pauses and face expressions naturally. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She uses her gestures naturally and made overall good eye contact through her speech. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. Her pronunciation and voice was clear enough to understand and her pauses also helped to have a moment of comprehension.
Assignment/Title : The person I admire 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? Her mom is someone that she admires the most. Though her life was harsh, she remains positive. Also she is very kind to others.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Not really. I think starting her speech with a photo of her mom could have played the role of a hook. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? I think it was logical enough:) First, the presenter talked about the harsh childhood of her mother. Then, she explains the reason why she respect her mom: her mom now became a person who has a positive mind and kind personality, even after those hardships. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? I think it was clear. But overall, the speech was a little bit short. I think she could have added more comments at the end, for example how her mom affected her in a positive way. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids There was no visual aid, but I think it would have been better if she used one. For example, a picture that she took with her mom would have made her speech more interesting. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. There was some hand gestures, but not much. In most of the times, the speaker was holding her hands, which resulted in lack of gestures. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The tone was good, and her pronunciation was clear enough that I could understand all!
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jin, Hayeon Video: Janita Wallin/My opinion, unit 5/Thu 3-4 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She talked about gender role. The intent of the speech is to let us not be constrained in our own gender but be what we want to be. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She directly went to her point. It could have been better if she used hook. However, she still grasped the attention of audience by going directly to her point. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? She gave appropriate example to portray gender stereotype such as frames of the photos in the kindergarten. Although some transitions were not very smooth, her speech was smooth and fluent overall. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She ended her speech by saying “Let’s just be what we want to be”. That sentence was very appropriate for her topic and it was very memorable. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Although she did not use visual aids and humor, she was enthusiastic and she used some pause to make her speech more effective. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She used enough gestures and made stable eye contact. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. Her pronunciation was clear and the volume was good. I could understand everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Na Yeon Lim
Speaker: Janita Wallin
Assignment/Title : A Great Vacation Idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall speech was about ‘Finland,’ which could be a beautiful place to travel if you love winter sports and winter.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, she started with asking questions are you interested in winter sports. It was effective for audiences to start guessing the place she will introduce.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She had lots of examples and evidences that came from her personal experiences. I believe there could have been more transitions though.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I believe it could have been better with more details. Still, it was memorable because she ended with saying “Yay!” That made me feel like I wanted to visit Finland even more.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She had enthusiasm that was obvious throughout her speech. .
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her eye contact was good. I felt like she was talking to me one on one. Also, her gestures were natural.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, her speech was easy to follow along and understand thanks to her clear pronunciation.
Evaluator: Sumin Park
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to recommend perfect place for vacation. And she recommended her hometown, Finland.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was effective that she told audience based on her past experiences. Also she suggested Finland could be the best vacation place if audiences like winter sports or northern lights, aurora.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She first started her speech by asking audiences if they are interested in winter sports or just chilling out in the place where it just looks like winter wonderland. And then she began to talk about the reasons why Finland would be the best place for vacation.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She restated the main points that she mentioned earlier in her speech. And the closing was memorable because she concluded by emphasizing on new things that audience can do when they visit Finland.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Yes, the speaker use enthusiasm and pauses while delivering her speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her eye contact toward the audience was great and her gestures were natural.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was great and she pronounced clearly so that every word could be understood perfectly.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jeeny Jung
Date: 6/8
Presentation: Unit 5 My Opinion
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She think it isn’t right to have gender roles nowadays. People shouldn’t force others to act in some way based on gender roles.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes. She started by saying that in the modern society which is 2017, there is no thing such as gender roles. It might have been better if she had said that it is different from the past at the front.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. She made an example by suggesting her childhood which was about taking photos in blue frames and pink frames as a child and said that she thinks it’s wrong. This helped me to understand her opinion.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Partly. She said that this is the reason why I oppose on gender roles, but she didn’t summarize her reasons.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes. She used pauses and face expressions naturally.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She uses her gestures naturally and made overall good eye contact through her speech.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. Her pronunciation and voice was clear enough to understand and her pauses also helped to have a moment of comprehension.
Evaluator: 201401933 Soyun OH, Tues. 9 A.M.
ReplyDeleteAssignment/Title : The person I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Her mom is someone that she admires the most. Though her life was harsh, she remains positive. Also she is very kind to others.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Not really. I think starting her speech with a photo of her mom could have played the role of a hook.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
I think it was logical enough:)
First, the presenter talked about the harsh childhood of her mother. Then, she explains the reason why she respect her mom: her mom now became a person who has a positive mind and kind personality, even after those hardships.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I think it was clear. But overall, the speech was a little bit short. I think she could have added more comments at the end, for example how her mom affected her in a positive way.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
There was no visual aid, but I think it would have been better if she used one. For example, a picture that she took with her mom would have made her speech more interesting.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
There was some hand gestures, but not much. In most of the times, the speaker was holding her hands, which resulted in lack of gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The tone was good, and her pronunciation was clear enough that I could understand all!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jin, Hayeon
Video: Janita Wallin/My opinion, unit 5/Thu 3-4
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She talked about gender role. The intent of the speech is to let us not be constrained in our own gender but be what we want to be.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She directly went to her point. It could have been better if she used hook. However, she still grasped the attention of audience by going directly to her point.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She gave appropriate example to portray gender stereotype such as frames of the photos in the kindergarten. Although some transitions were not very smooth, her speech was smooth and fluent overall.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She ended her speech by saying “Let’s just be what we want to be”. That sentence was very appropriate for her topic and it was very memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Although she did not use visual aids and humor, she was enthusiastic and she used some pause to make her speech more effective.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She used enough gestures and made stable eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. Her pronunciation was clear and the volume was good. I could understand everything.