Evaluator: Christina Woo Speaker: Hyunjin Song Video: Unit 5 Opinion
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -The speaker gave an opinion speech about homosexuality. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -I think the hook was the part in 1:05 when the speaker said there are many people who condemn homosexual people without reasons, and “I hate you because you are homosexual”. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes the speech was logical. The speaker gave her personal and honest thought on this topic. The transition was smooth and I liked her ideas. I especially liked that she described the actor specifically such as his accent and why she found him interesting, instead of just saying “There was a really cool actor”. It made me visualize about the character which made me even more curious about the speaker’s favorite actor. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -The conclusion was short but memorable. The speaker concluded her speech with saying that homosexuals also have human rights and shouldn’t be condemned by people. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? -Although the speaker didn’t use visual aids, it was catchy enough for the audience to understand and to keep focusing on the speech. The speaker had a good pace and I could feel the sincerity in her speech. 6. - What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -The speaker had good posture, eye contact, and gestures. She was natural and she seemed comfortable in presenting her speech. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -The speaker had a good tone and the volume was good, except for the distracting sound in the background. I understood the speech very well. This topic must have been difficult to talk about, but she did a good job in explaining her opinions! Thank you!
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Na Yeon Lim Speaker: Hyunjin Song Assignment/Title : Unit 1 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The person she admires is Steve Jobs. He was the creator of Apple, and she was greatly influenced by him throughout her life. It was well addressed. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes, she showed the picture of Steve Jobs. She started out with thanks for watching my vieo, but I believe that could have been in the conclusion. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, she prepared a lot for her video. It was easy to follow along and keep focused on her video. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? It was concise and memorable at the same time. She ended her speech by saying how she hoped someone will look up to her just like she does to Steve Jobs in the future. It was suitable closing for this assignment. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Definitely. I could see her enthusiasm about this topic throughout the whole speech. Her humor lies in her hand gestures and facial expressions. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She had a very good eye contact since she did not use her notes at all. Her gestures were good as well. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? I believe she was flawless in that point. Everything was planned out well and the topic suited her well.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Video: Unit 2 Great vacation idea
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : She suggested us to go to Bourton on the water, place in UK. She told about her own experience and why it would be good place to visit.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : The fact that i had never heard about this place and as she said it is not that well known made this speech really effective and interesting and i think in the beginning when she asked some questions the audience got ready for the speech and speaker get them to concentrate.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Speech was logical, examples were great and transitions were clear.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Good closing and after the speech i really remember the place and want to visit it sometime.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : There was some pretty pictures which made the speech more enjoyable.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : She watched her notes too much. So i would have liked more eye contact. Also gestures were lacking a bit because she was holding the notes in her hands.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Her voice was clear, volume was good and i could understand everything. Good speech.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyunseo Jung Speaker: hyunjin song Assignment/Title : unit 1 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? her speech was about a person she admire the most, steven jobs. She explained the reason why she admire him. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? her detailed acting caught my attention. it was really effective. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? she analyzed detailed experience. So the composition of her speech was really logical. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? For the conclusion she linked steven jobs with her dream and major. It was really nice and well organized. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? she used appropriate pauses, and humor. It made her speech really interesting. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. her eye contact was natural. When explaining her experience, she used adequate actions. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? sure. her speech was really clear so it was easy to understand most of her ideas.
Evaluator: Joonhyung Kim (THU 1-2) Speaker: hyunjin song Assignment/Title : Unit 2
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - The speaker talked about how to make a candle. She told us the materials, four steps to make a candle. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - She introduced why candle is worthy. By that I got interested more about that. I think the hook was good enough.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - It was logical. The speaker used example for place and points out specific temperature degree. Because the presentation included the steps, I could follow the transition easily.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - It wasn’t summarized but I can get inspired by her closing statement and it was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? - She used well-prepared PPT file. I could see proper pictures for each step and her enthusiasm.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - The speaker used eye contact well, and in some parts she used gestures to make the audience focus on the screen and picture.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - Definitely it did. She has clear voice and I could understand whole speech well.
Date : 2017.06.08 Evaluator: Jaehee Chung Speaker: Hyunjin Song Assignment/Title : Unit2/ A great vacation idea
1. What was the speakers strongest main point? -She introduced a place which is meaningful to her and recommended to visit there 2. What did you like about the presentation? -She used ppt well and tried to communicate with audiences 3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject? -I learned that the place she introduced is not fancy but peaceful and there are not many Koreans. 4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? -Yes. She prepared adequate photos and her 5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? -Yes. Her voice was big and also the speed was good enough. 6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion? -Yes. She started with the opening with some questions and then closed with recommendation to visit the place. In the body, she talked about the reason why she chose the place. 7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact. -I noticed that she looked at the notes or the ppt slide more frequently than looking at the audiences. 8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? -As I mentioned above, I think it would have been better if she had more eye contacts with audiences. 9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole? -Her presenting attitude is really great. She had nice volume, right speed, and appropriate gestures. Also, she looked very calm and well-prepared. I thought her reasons were interesting because she talked about her experience in UK. Overall, it was wonderful presentation.
Evaluator: Seounho Kim Speaker: Hyunjin Song Date: 06.08.2017 Title: Icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Ther purpose of her speech was introducing about herself. She talked about how she overcame stress and gloomy feeling she got as she had to retake korea's university entrance exam. It was really well addressed that I could learn a lot from her speech.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes,there was great and novel hook which was comparing herself to an animation character. It had nothing to improve in my opinion
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was. First she started the speech by asking questions to the audience and saying how sad she was at first. But by traveling to other countries she learned how to be a happy person and this process was well told with good transitions
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She emphasized to live happy and worthy life by using checklist to make one's life happy. As she finished her speech with great quote about life, her speech was really memorable and worth watching
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
I could see how passionate she is in life through her speech. Her pace of the speech was good and I could see how well she prepared for the speech by seeing her visual aids. Comparing herself with character itself was aimed to be humor I guess
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her body language was good, not too much and not too little. Posture was good and as she memorized almost every line of her speech eye contact was perfect as well
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good, loud enough to understand her speech. Pronunciation was flawless also. I could learn a lot from her speech, not just understanding her speech.
Evaluator: Christina Woo
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hyunjin Song
Video: Unit 5 Opinion
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-The speaker gave an opinion speech about homosexuality.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think the hook was the part in 1:05 when the speaker said there are many people who condemn homosexual people without reasons, and “I hate you because you are homosexual”.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes the speech was logical. The speaker gave her personal and honest thought on this topic. The transition was smooth and I liked her ideas. I especially liked that she described the actor specifically such as his accent and why she found him interesting, instead of just saying “There was a really cool actor”. It made me visualize about the character which made me even more curious about the speaker’s favorite actor.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-The conclusion was short but memorable. The speaker concluded her speech with saying that homosexuals also have human rights and shouldn’t be condemned by people.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
-Although the speaker didn’t use visual aids, it was catchy enough for the audience to understand and to keep focusing on the speech. The speaker had a good pace and I could feel the sincerity in her speech.
6. - What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-The speaker had good posture, eye contact, and gestures. She was natural and she seemed comfortable in presenting her speech.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The speaker had a good tone and the volume was good, except for the distracting sound in the background. I understood the speech very well. This topic must have been difficult to talk about, but she did a good job in explaining her opinions! Thank you!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Na Yeon Lim
Speaker: Hyunjin Song
Assignment/Title : Unit 1
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The person she admires is Steve Jobs. He was the creator of Apple, and she was greatly influenced by him throughout her life. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes, she showed the picture of Steve Jobs. She started out with thanks for watching my vieo, but I believe that could have been in the conclusion.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, she prepared a lot for her video. It was easy to follow along and keep focused on her video.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
It was concise and memorable at the same time. She ended her speech by saying how she hoped someone will look up to her just like she does to Steve Jobs in the future. It was suitable closing for this assignment.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Definitely. I could see her enthusiasm about this topic throughout the whole speech. Her humor lies in her hand gestures and facial expressions.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She had a very good eye contact since she did not use her notes at all. Her gestures were good as well.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I believe she was flawless in that point. Everything was planned out well and the topic suited her well.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Unit 2 Great vacation idea
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : She suggested us to go to Bourton on the water, place in UK. She told about her own experience and why it would be good place to visit.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : The fact that i had never heard about this place and as she said it is not that well known made this speech really effective and interesting and i think in the beginning when she asked some questions the audience got ready for the speech and speaker get them to concentrate.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Speech was logical, examples were great and transitions were clear.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Good closing and after the speech i really remember the place and want to visit it sometime.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : There was some pretty pictures which made the speech more enjoyable.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : She watched her notes too much. So i would have liked more eye contact. Also gestures were lacking a bit because she was holding the notes in her hands.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Her voice was clear, volume was good and i could understand everything. Good speech.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyunseo Jung
Speaker: hyunjin song
Assignment/Title : unit 1
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
her speech was about a person she admire the most, steven jobs. She explained the reason why she admire him.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
her detailed acting caught my attention. it was really effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
she analyzed detailed experience. So the composition of her speech was really logical.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
For the conclusion she linked steven jobs with her dream and major. It was really nice and well organized.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
she used appropriate pauses, and humor. It made her speech really interesting.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
her eye contact was natural. When explaining her experience, she used adequate actions.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
sure. her speech was really clear so it was easy to understand most of her ideas.
Evaluator: Joonhyung Kim (THU 1-2)
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: hyunjin song
Assignment/Title : Unit 2
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The speaker talked about how to make a candle. She told us the materials, four steps to make a candle. It was well addressed.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- She introduced why candle is worthy. By that I got interested more about that. I think the hook was good enough.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- It was logical. The speaker used example for place and points out specific temperature degree. Because the presentation included the steps, I could follow the transition easily.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- It wasn’t summarized but I can get inspired by her closing statement and it was memorable.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
- She used well-prepared PPT file. I could see proper pictures for each step and her enthusiasm.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- The speaker used eye contact well, and in some parts she used gestures to make the audience focus on the screen and picture.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Definitely it did. She has clear voice and I could understand whole speech well.
Date : 2017.06.08
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jaehee Chung
Speaker: Hyunjin Song
Assignment/Title : Unit2/ A great vacation idea
1. What was the speakers strongest main point?
-She introduced a place which is meaningful to her and recommended to visit there
2. What did you like about the presentation?
-She used ppt well and tried to communicate with audiences
3. How well did the audience get to know the speech subject?
-I learned that the place she introduced is not fancy but peaceful and there are not many Koreans.
4. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
-Yes. She prepared adequate photos and her
5. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
-Yes. Her voice was big and also the speed was good enough.
6. Was there a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
-Yes. She started with the opening with some questions and then closed with recommendation to visit the place. In the body, she talked about the reason why she chose the place.
7. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes/eye contact.
-I noticed that she looked at the notes or the ppt slide more frequently than looking at the audiences.
8. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
-As I mentioned above, I think it would have been better if she had more eye contacts with audiences.
9. What was your overall (positive) evaluation of the speech as a whole?
-Her presenting attitude is really great. She had nice volume, right speed, and appropriate gestures. Also, she looked very calm and well-prepared. I thought her reasons were interesting because she talked about her experience in UK. Overall, it was wonderful presentation.
Evaluator: Seounho Kim
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hyunjin Song
Date: 06.08.2017
Title: Icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Ther purpose of her speech was introducing about herself. She talked about how she overcame stress and gloomy feeling she got as she had to retake korea's university entrance exam. It was really well addressed that I could learn a lot from her speech.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes,there was great and novel hook which was comparing herself to an animation character. It had nothing to improve in my opinion
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was. First she started the speech by asking questions to the audience and saying how sad she was at first. But by traveling to other countries she learned how to be a happy person and this process was well told with good transitions
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She emphasized to live happy and worthy life by using checklist to make one's life happy. As she finished her speech with great quote about life, her speech was really memorable and worth watching
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
I could see how passionate she is in life through her speech. Her pace of the speech was good and I could see how well she prepared for the speech by seeing her visual aids. Comparing herself with character itself was aimed to be humor I guess
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her body language was good, not too much and not too little. Posture was good and as she memorized almost every line of her speech eye contact was perfect as well
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good, loud enough to understand her speech. Pronunciation was flawless also. I could learn a lot from her speech, not just understanding her speech.