Evaluator: Christina Woo Speaker Ka Pui Cheung Video: Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -It was about the problem of driving while talking on the cellphone. The speaker gave 3 main ideas for this topic. First, using cellphone is worse than drunk driving. Second, even hands free devices talking is dangerous while driving. Third, it causes huge traffic accidents. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -I think the hook part was on 1:30. “The cellphone usage should be banded while driving”. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes the structure was logical, well organized, and the transition was smooth. The speaker supported the speech by addressing the results from a university study which was remarkable and believable. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -The speaker summarized the speech by walking us through the main points once again. The ending was extremely memorable, “Put down your phone. Keep your eyes on the road. Stay safe.” It was precise and attention-grabbing. It is a fact and everyone should do so! 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? - The speaker did not use visual aids, but instead, she had notes with her. The speaker had a good pace. The speech kept me interested and I liked the results that she shared with us. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -The speaker didn’t have much body language but it was not disturbing at all. She had good eye contact as well. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -The tone of the speaker’s voice was good and clear, but the volume of the video itself was a bit weak. (I’ve turned it to max.) I understood everything in the video. Thanks!
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : She was talking about how to prevent hangover like eating, drinking water and eating icecream. She also told that korea is the country where people drink liquor the most in the world.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : There was some interesting facts in the beginning and in the middle of her speech. They were effective so the listener would keep listening.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Beginning was interesting but i didn't expect her to start talking about how to prevent hangover so the beginning miss lead a bit. Examples were new and interesting.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Conclusion was good. It gave the idea why she was talking about this subject. I was waiting for it.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : I think the subject was a bit humorous itself. She used visual aids and pauses her speaking at times.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : Eye contact lacks at times cos she was reading her notes quite a lot. Also there could have been more gestures if she wasn't holding the notes. But her posture looked quite calm.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Her voice tone was good and i could understood everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jang Hajong Evaluated video: the person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She talked her role model. She introduced Mother Teresa.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes there is. She question like ”who is she?” 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. It was logical to understand. There are great evidences and examples about her role model. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. The conclusion restated well. I could remember easily. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? good. but there is no visible thing like PPT.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. eye contacting is good. But gestures and body language are more needed.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. I could easily understand her vacation plan.
Evaluator: Christina Woo
ReplyDeleteSpeaker Ka Pui Cheung
Video: Unit 5
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech? Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-It was about the problem of driving while talking on the cellphone. The speaker gave 3 main ideas for this topic. First, using cellphone is worse than drunk driving. Second, even hands free devices talking is dangerous while driving. Third, it causes huge traffic accidents.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I think the hook part was on 1:30. “The cellphone usage should be banded while driving”.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes the structure was logical, well organized, and the transition was smooth. The speaker supported the speech by addressing the results from a university study which was remarkable and believable.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-The speaker summarized the speech by walking us through the main points once again. The ending was extremely memorable, “Put down your phone. Keep your eyes on the road. Stay safe.” It was precise and attention-grabbing. It is a fact and everyone should do so!
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
- The speaker did not use visual aids, but instead, she had notes with her. The speaker had a good pace. The speech kept me interested and I liked the results that she shared with us.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-The speaker didn’t have much body language but it was not disturbing at all. She had good eye contact as well.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The tone of the speaker’s voice was good and clear, but the volume of the video itself was a bit weak. (I’ve turned it to max.) I understood everything in the video. Thanks!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Unit 4
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : She was talking about how to prevent hangover like eating, drinking water and eating icecream. She also told that korea is the country where people drink liquor the most in the world.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : There was some interesting facts in the beginning and in the middle of her speech. They were effective so the listener would keep listening.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Beginning was interesting but i didn't expect her to start talking about how to prevent hangover so the beginning miss lead a bit. Examples were new and interesting.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : Conclusion was good. It gave the idea why she was talking about this subject. I was waiting for it.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids. : I think the subject was a bit humorous itself. She used visual aids and pauses her speaking at times.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : Eye contact lacks at times cos she was reading her notes quite a lot. Also there could have been more gestures if she wasn't holding the notes. But her posture looked quite calm.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : Her voice tone was good and i could understood everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jang Hajong
Evaluated video: the person who I admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She talked her role model. She introduced Mother Teresa.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes there is. She question like ”who is she?”
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. It was logical to understand. There are great evidences and examples about her role model.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. The conclusion restated well. I could remember easily.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
good. but there is no visible thing like PPT.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
eye contacting is good. But gestures and body language are more needed.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. I could easily understand her vacation plan.