The person I admire https://youtu.be/e1t04L5Mflk
My great vacation plan https://youtu.be/Eo7wOYBDeWw
Ice Breaking( First major assignment ) https://youtu.be/WWoquSl5pmA
Unit 4 https://youtu.be/sGOpRaG7ILQ
In my opinion https://youtu.be/_2_GzaKMec8
Second major assignment https://youtu.be/uc-4A39uatI
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Why beauty contests are bad
Date : Wed 7 Jun
Evaluator: Minyong Han
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? :
The main point was to argue why beauty contests are bad and should be stopped. It was addressed well.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :
There was a hook. I wasn't interested in beauty contests, but I got interested in them with her question.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :
Her structure was logical in that she provided enough evidence and examples. The transitions between ideas were good.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :
Her conclusion was pretty concise, and she included all the main points. So, I liked the closing.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.:
She did use pauses, but she didn't use enthusiasm, humor, or visual aids.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. :
She tried to use gestures as much as possible, and her posture was good.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? :
She was audible enough, but I had to raise the volume to hear her clearly. I could understand her though.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: The Person I Admire
Date: 6/7
Evaluator: Jeeny Jung
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She admires Korea’s figure skating medalist Yuna Kim for her diligence, passion and mind control.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes. She said at the first part she is going to introduce Yuna Kim as her admirer. It might have been better if she said there was 3 main reasons at the front.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. She had 3 main reasons for her speech body. Also, she compared herself with Yuna Kim which explained why she admired her.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. She summarized that there were 3 reasons why she admires Yuna Kim. Also, the closing was memorable as she said that she is trying to be like her.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes. She paused occasionally and made some emphasizes on the parts she wanted to underline.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She is making good eye contact and she uses her gestures well by making her hands natural as she continued her speech.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. Her voice and pronunciation was clear enough for me to understand
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jang Hajong
Evaluated video: my vacation plan
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She talked her vacation plan. She said that she planned to go to Boracay.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I think it was not clear to understand. She just use his experiences.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. It was logical to understand. There are great evidences and examples.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. The conclusion restated well. I could remember easily.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
good. but there is no visible thing like PPT.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
eye contacting is good. But gestures and body language are more needed.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. I could easily understand her vacation plan.
Evaluator : Sangwon Park
ReplyDeletespeaker : Hayeon Jin
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- she presented her vacation plan in Boracay. That was interesting and well addressed because she said her own experience in there.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- I think the hook was starting part because she revealed that she lived boracy in 6 months. That was enough to attract attention.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- she used examples from her experience and illustrated her plan well. The transition was also natural.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- the conclusion was concise. She said her hope about going boracay again after graduation. Because the purpose of this speech is revealing her plan, I think her conclusion is relevant.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- Well, I think her speech was little bit fast. If she did pauses between her sentences or used visual aids, it will be helpful to understand the speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- Her eye contact was good and the body language was also appropriate.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Yes, the voice was good to hear and cleary conveyed to audience. So, I could understand everything.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hayeon Jin
Evaluator: Sunyoung Park
Video: 2nd major video
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Death, How should we deal with our death
Why should we be ready for our death
How should we prepare our death
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Started with a guessing question and it was interesting question.
It actually pulled me into the question and your topic by only that question
Intriguing enough.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Under the main topic of “how to deal with death”, she answered for each 2 details.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Although she did not restated her two points, I like how she concluded her speech.
Rather than easily say, “I want you to keep that in mind, thank you”, she strongly suggested viewers to think about her topic deeply.
Could feel her enthusiasm about the topic
But I wish, her last sentence to be different. Too short and usual.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She didn’t use any visual aids, but her speech was powerful enough, maybe her topic is so strong or it is her way of presenting such a gloomy and deep topic with clear supporting details.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Rich body language
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Very good. Clearly enunciated and pronounced. Also volume was great.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hayeon Jin
Evaluator: Sunyoung Park
Video: 2nd major video
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Death, How should we deal with our death
Why should we be ready for our death
How should we prepare our death
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Started with a guessing question and it was interesting question.
It actually pulled me into the question and your topic by only that question
Intriguing enough.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Under the main topic of “how to deal with death”, she answered for each 2 details.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Although she did not restated her two points, I like how she concluded her speech.
Rather than easily say, “I want you to keep that in mind, thank you”, she strongly suggested viewers to think about her topic deeply.
Could feel her enthusiasm about the topic
But I wish, her last sentence to be different. Too short and usual.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She didn’t use any visual aids, but her speech was powerful enough, maybe her topic is so strong or it is her way of presenting such a gloomy and deep topic with clear supporting details.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Rich body language
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Very good. Clearly enunciated and pronounced. Also volume was great.