The person who I admire : https://youtu.be/4zng1646WNU
a great vacation idea : https://youtu.be/xrhgIBlZaPg
ice breaker(1st major assignment) : https://youtu.be/idtSKBC6Fzo
Let me explain : https://youtu.be/7HSYxn52W2s
In my opinion : https://youtu.be/b1LWpouvhc0
2nd major assignment : https://youtu.be/V1y2eZSXPwQ
Evaluator: Sumin Park
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to show his opinion about the spread of plastic surgery.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was very effective because his opinion that he doesn’t think the spread of plastic surgery is negative was well supported by his 2 main reasons.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure of his speech was logical because it was well organized by dividing 3 parts; introduction, body and conclusion. And as I mentioned earlier his 2 main points well supported his opinion. I really liked the content of the reasons that he suggested.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The closing was memorable because he restated his main points perfectly not just summarizing exactly what he said on the body part.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He didn’t talk too fast and he paused well while he was delivering his speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact toward audience was great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was great and he enunciated and pronounced clearly so that every speech he made could be understood well.
Speaker : Wooseong Kim
ReplyDeleteEvaluator : Hyunjin Song
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He tried to tell us the person who he admire most. Yes, It was addressed well. Actually the person he admire is the character in the book so he told us the book's story and how he felt while reading that book.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I can't catch a clear point that he want to emphasize but the effective point was that he talked about his own experience(helping others) and the feelings he felted.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. It was good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. His summary on the book was good. And he continually restated some important point while speaking about his experience. The closing was also good.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
He used some pauses in his speech but didn't use visual aids or humor. Though the speech was enough to attract the audience and he seemed to have enthusiasm.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact was very good. And also the posture was nice. It would be better if he use more gestures next time :)
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. All things were perfect!
Feedback for first major assignment
ReplyDeleteDate : 2017.06.08
Evaluator: Hyeonseok Nho
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He talked about 3 anecdotes in his life. I think audiences can fully understand her content well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I was impressed that he was trying to communicate with the audiences in Opening section.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
There was a definite opening, body, and conclusion. Also, he well supported each of anecdotes by examples.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He recommended the audiences to look back on their lives. This made me look back on my life.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.
He didn’t use humor. But he use visual aid, so I think the audiences would be easier to understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
It is good that he had many hand gestures because it made me more focused. Also he had many eye contacts with the audiences.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
His voice was clearly and audibly enough to hear presentation. And the volume of his voice is enough too.
Evaluator : Sangwon Park
ReplyDeletespeaker : Wooseong Kim
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- He talked about the process of making mapa tofu.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- Yes, he used questioning and told his own story about mafa tofu. That was enough to take a notice.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Yes, the structure in speech was logical. He used ppt for transitions between ideas, so that was good to understand the content.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- Yes, there was concise conclusion. However, if he restate the process, it will be more memorable because the subject about mafa tofu is unfamiliar to many people including me.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- Yes, he did. He used colorful visual aids which is ppt. The cartoon in ppt was also interesting to me.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- He was good at eye contact. He communicated with audience using question. That’s positive thing because communication made audience concentrate more than before.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- Yes, the volume was good. And his pronounce was clear to hear. I could enjoyed his speech.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyobin Jeon
Video: Unit2 a great vacation idea
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He explained some parts of Sapporo which can show a lot of attractive aspects of Sapporo. Because this speech was based on his personal experience, it persuaded me.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He said Sapporo is so attractive and good place to visit that he wants to travel this place aain although he has been there one time. This words could make a lot of people sympathize with his speech.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was. He mentioned some examples based on his real experiences.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He did not simmarize or restate ideas he mentioned at his speech, but he ended his speech with his favorite quotation. It was very impressive.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
He didn't use any visual aids. If he shows some beautiful pictures of Sapporo, it wil be much better than before.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact with audiences was very good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Volume of his speech was perfect and I can clearly hear what he said.
Evaluator: Seounho Kim
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Wooseong Kim
Date: 06.08.2017
Title: Let me explain
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Ther purpose of his speech was to explain about process and for him it was making Mapa tofu. It was so well delivered that I could follow his instructions to make it instead of reading cook book
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes,there was fascinating hook. Despite his speech being about how to cook food he asked the audiences whether they know an animation or not. It was really effective to catch others' attention
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was, because the topic itself was all about being logical. Ways to make the food were well organized with good and proper explanations. As the speech was organized well, transitions were also good
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He concluded his speech by showing picture of the animation he first told the audience. Also he persuaded others to try to make Mapa tofu by mentioning how surprised their friends and families would be. So I could remember his speech for long.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
It seemed that he knew the moments to pause when we are giving speech to others. Introducing topic with his favorite animation was humorous. And PPT he used well showed the process of making Mapa tofu effectively
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He used body languages well but I just thought it would be far better for him to use a wide range of it. However posture, eye contact were all good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was appropriate and pronunciation was good. Also I could understand all of his speech well and I liked his funny intonation as well