1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker talked about using real name in Internet. She supported her idea with two reasons. It will protect people from cybercrime and make the information more believable. She concluded by restating those reasons and her opinion. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There was a hook in her presentation. She stated some popular belief that’s prevalent in our society. And effectively disagreed with it to talk about her own opinion. But I suggest specifying the hook. So, instead of just talking about some opposite opinion that people have, you could pick up a famous person and talk about the quote. This can help the hook to be more interesting. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? It was logical enough. She stated her own opinion and then supported it using two reasons. She also used transitions that help the audience to effectively recognize the logic. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Considering the time, the conclusion was adequate. Also, she summarized her main points through restating her opinion and main reasons. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She didn’t use visual aids or humor but used pauses when she speaks. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She used a lot of eye contact but I think it would have been better if she used some more gestures. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The pronunciation was quite clear but the voice was a little small so I think it would have been better if she spoke louder. Thank you for sharing these videos:)
Assignment / Title: Unit 1: A Person I Admire Evaluator: Sanni Honkanen Speaker: Hyobin Jeon Date: 2017-06-06
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? - The person she admires the most is Yuna Kim because of her patience and passion. She addressed the point well, as she mentions why she admires here, such as Yuna Kim overcame hardships and became successful. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? - As a non-Korean, she could have explained more about Yuna Kim and her achievements as the speech was a bit short. But I liked how she told some examples how Yuna Kim affected her life. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? - Logical and well-organized structure, also good transitions between the subtopics. Nice examples about when she was younger. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? - The conclusion was a bit hurried and short, but her speech overall was a bit short so there was not much to conclude about. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids… - She was a bit monotonic, however it was nice to listen to her. No visual aids used. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. - She was standing still throughout her speech, so she could have used more gestures. Very good eye contact. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? - She spoke in a really calm way, so it was easy to follow her. I understood her perfectly and the volume was good.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Jeeny Jung Date: 6/8 Presentation: Unit 2 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. She started with a question asking whether we are interested in movies and then she said she is going to talk about a country which is famous for being backgrounds in various movies. And I think it’s great and there’s nothing to improve. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. She has a logical structure. She first told us about why she became interested in this country and then told a short summary of the movie and then told us the reasons which had a natural flow. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? I think it would have been better if she had summarized her reasons shortly. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? Yes. She made natural pauses while continuing her speech. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. Her gestures were natural and made adequate eye contact. She used her hands when she had to explain something which was great. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. Her pronunciation and tone, volume was very clear to understand what she was saying.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Video : 'The Person I Admire Most'
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to introduce her role model. She talked about Yuna Kim, and why she admired her. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? I do not think there is a hook for this video, and if she did include one in her video, she would have been able to receive the audiences’ attention easily. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, it was logical. She supported her points by giving her own examples for why she admired Yuna Kim. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was memorable as she said she will continue her efforts for her future, just like Yuna Kim. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, She did have a lot of pauses in her speeches, and this was helpful for conveying her presentation to the audience. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She had strong eye contact with the audience, but she could have used more body languages. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, her voice was clear and audible. I could understand her speech quite clearly.
Evaluator: Seounho Kim Speaker: Hyobin Jeon Date: 06.08.2017 Title: Icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Ther purpose of her speech was introducing herself with a story linked to her life. She talked about how she got in to Eicc department of HUFS. It was well delivered as she used her own life story.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? The speech had normal hook. So it would be much better if she had used more catchy hook such as asking questions to the audience.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Because she spoke first with reasons for choosing the topic and then moving on to the main subject, I think the structure was logical and well organized. So the transition between ideas was also good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She concluded her speech saying how hard she tried to enter HUFS just like others in class. Also she talked about turning point that could make others life different. And that is why the closing memorable because I could agree with her thoughts about reagarding entrance to HUFS as turning point.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
She used her own stories and also visual aids that showed the content of her speech effectively. Also pace of her speech was really appropriate for others to understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She did not use much body language in my opinion so it would be better for her to use them more next time. But as she memorized almost every line of her speech, her eye contact was perfect.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I really liked her speech because I could understand her speech due to her clear pronunciation and loud and audible voice.
Evaluator: Sungtae Kim
ReplyDeleteDate: 2017/06/06
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speaker talked about using real name in Internet. She supported her idea with two reasons. It will protect people from cybercrime and make the information more believable. She concluded by restating those reasons and her opinion.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was a hook in her presentation. She stated some popular belief that’s prevalent in our society. And effectively disagreed with it to talk about her own opinion. But I suggest specifying the hook. So, instead of just talking about some opposite opinion that people have, you could pick up a famous person and talk about the quote. This can help the hook to be more interesting.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
It was logical enough. She stated her own opinion and then supported it using two reasons. She also used transitions that help the audience to effectively recognize the logic.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Considering the time, the conclusion was adequate. Also, she summarized her main points through restating her opinion and main reasons.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She didn’t use visual aids or humor but used pauses when she speaks.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She used a lot of eye contact but I think it would have been better if she used some more gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The pronunciation was quite clear but the voice was a little small so I think it would have been better if she spoke louder.
Thank you for sharing these videos:)
Assignment / Title: Unit 1: A Person I Admire
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Sanni Honkanen
Speaker: Hyobin Jeon
Date: 2017-06-06
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
- The person she admires the most is Yuna Kim because of her patience and passion. She addressed the point well, as she mentions why she admires here, such as Yuna Kim overcame hardships and became successful.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
- As a non-Korean, she could have explained more about Yuna Kim and her achievements as the speech was a bit short. But I liked how she told some examples how Yuna Kim affected her life.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
- Logical and well-organized structure, also good transitions between the subtopics. Nice examples about when she was younger.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
- The conclusion was a bit hurried and short, but her speech overall was a bit short so there was not much to conclude about.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
- She was a bit monotonic, however it was nice to listen to her. No visual aids used.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
- She was standing still throughout her speech, so she could have used more gestures. Very good eye contact.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
- She spoke in a really calm way, so it was easy to follow her. I understood her perfectly and the volume was good.
Good job! :)
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Jeeny Jung
Date: 6/8
Presentation: Unit 2
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes. She started with a question asking whether we are interested in movies and then she said she is going to talk about a country which is famous for being backgrounds in various movies. And I think it’s great and there’s nothing to improve.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. She has a logical structure. She first told us about why she became interested in this country and then told a short summary of the movie and then told us the reasons which had a natural flow.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
I think it would have been better if she had summarized her reasons shortly.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
Yes. She made natural pauses while continuing her speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
Her gestures were natural and made adequate eye contact. She used her hands when she had to explain something which was great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. Her pronunciation and tone, volume was very clear to understand what she was saying.
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
ReplyDeleteVideo : 'The Person I Admire Most'
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to introduce her role model. She talked about Yuna Kim, and why she admired her.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
I do not think there is a hook for this video, and if she did include one in her video, she would have been able to receive the audiences’ attention easily.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was logical. She supported her points by giving her own examples for why she admired Yuna Kim.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was memorable as she said she will continue her efforts for her future, just like Yuna Kim.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She did have a lot of pauses in her speeches, and this was helpful for conveying her presentation to the audience.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She had strong eye contact with the audience, but she could have used more body languages.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, her voice was clear and audible. I could understand her speech quite clearly.
Evaluator: Seounho Kim
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Hyobin Jeon
Date: 06.08.2017
Title: Icebreaker
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
Ther purpose of her speech was introducing herself with a story linked to her life. She talked about how she got in to Eicc department of HUFS. It was well delivered as she used her own life story.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
The speech had normal hook. So it would be much better if she had used more catchy hook such as asking questions to the audience.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Because she spoke first with reasons for choosing the topic and then moving on to the main subject, I think the structure was logical and well organized. So the transition between ideas was also good.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She concluded her speech saying how hard she tried to enter HUFS just like others in class. Also she talked about turning point that could make others life different. And that is why the closing memorable because I could agree with her thoughts about reagarding entrance to HUFS as turning point.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids…
She used her own stories and also visual aids that showed the content of her speech effectively. Also pace of her speech was really appropriate for others to understand.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She did not use much body language in my opinion so it would be better for her to use them more next time. But as she memorized almost every line of her speech, her eye contact was perfect.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
I really liked her speech because I could understand her speech due to her clear pronunciation and loud and audible voice.