Evaluator: Sungtae Kim Date: 2017/6/7 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speech was about abolishing laws to restrict phone subsidies. He gave two reasons about it. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? Yes. There was a hook. He introduced about why this is an issue in Korea. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The speech was logical and easy to understand. He also used transition words. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The conclusion was very concise but addressed all important points in the speech. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? He used pauses well and stressed important points. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. He used many eye contacts with the audience. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The pronunciation and volume were adequate to hear and understand. Thank you for sharing:)
Evaluator: Sumin Park 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to recommend vacation place, London. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? It was effective that he used visual aids to show his recommended place, London. But it would have been much better if he showed more pictures of London. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The structure was well organized because his 2 main reasons supported his points clearly. Also he suggested additional reasons by saying England is famous for soccer. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? The closing would be more memorable if he restated main points clearly or he could have used quotes. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Yes, he paused well enough that it was easy to understand what he was saying and I liked the way he used visual aids to make his speech more effectively. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. His eye contact toward the audience was great. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The volume was good so that it was easy to understand, and he also pronounced clearly so everything could be understood.
Generic Presentation Evaluation Evaluator: Hyobin Jeon Video: Unit 4: How to revise the constitution of our country 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? He explained his opinions about how we can revise the constitution of our country, South Korea. He suggested total 5 method of revising the constitution of South Korea. It was logical so it could persuade many people's mind. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? He mentioned that South Korea should pay a lot of attention because of the promises of presidential candidates,which are related to his speech subject. I think it was effective. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, it was. It was logical because all his 5 supporting ideas said about how we should revise the constitution of our country. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? He did not simmarize or restate ideas he mentioned at his speech, and I felt that he concluded his speech so quickly. If he adds some unique style at his speech or summarizes his opinions, it will be much better speech than before. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? He looked very confident at this video, but he didn's use any visual aids, pause, or humor. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. His eye contact was very good. But, more gestures are needed. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Volume of his speech was perfect and I can clearly hear what he said.
Evaluator: Sungtae Kim
ReplyDeleteDate: 2017/6/7
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speech was about abolishing laws to restrict phone subsidies. He gave two reasons about it.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
Yes. There was a hook. He introduced about why this is an issue in Korea.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The speech was logical and easy to understand. He also used transition words.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The conclusion was very concise but addressed all important points in the speech.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
He used pauses well and stressed important points.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
He used many eye contacts with the audience.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The pronunciation and volume were adequate to hear and understand.
Thank you for sharing:)
Evaluator: Sumin Park
ReplyDelete1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to recommend vacation place, London.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was effective that he used visual aids to show his recommended place, London. But it would have been much better if he showed more pictures of London.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The structure was well organized because his 2 main reasons supported his points clearly. Also he suggested additional reasons by saying England is famous for soccer.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
The closing would be more memorable if he restated main points clearly or he could have used quotes.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Yes, he paused well enough that it was easy to understand what he was saying and I liked the way he used visual aids to make his speech more effectively.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact toward the audience was great.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume was good so that it was easy to understand, and he also pronounced clearly so everything could be understood.
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Hyobin Jeon
Video: Unit 4: How to revise the constitution of our country
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
He explained his opinions about how we can revise the constitution of our country, South Korea. He suggested total 5 method of revising the constitution of South Korea. It was logical so it could persuade many people's mind.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
He mentioned that South Korea should pay a lot of attention because of the promises of presidential candidates,which are related to his speech subject. I think it was effective.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was. It was logical because all his 5 supporting ideas said about how we should revise the constitution of our country.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
He did not simmarize or restate ideas he mentioned at his speech, and I felt that he concluded his speech so quickly. If he adds some unique style at his speech or summarizes his opinions, it will be much better speech than before.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
He looked very confident at this video, but he didn's use any visual aids, pause, or humor.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
His eye contact was very good. But, more gestures are needed.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Volume of his speech was perfect and I can clearly hear what he said.