Evaluator: Ka Pui Cheung Speaker: Sunyoung Park Video: Unit 4 1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -The speaker talked about the progress for interpreting. The speaker talked about the differences between consecutive interpreting and simultaneous interpreting, and the three progresses of interpreting. First, understanding. Second, analyzing. Third, re-expressing. 2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -A hook is quite difficult to find in this speech. It would be better to ask a rhetorical question at the start. 3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes, the structure was well-organized, and the transition was smooth. 4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -It would be better to restate the main points again or add the concluding remarks in the conclusion. 5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, - The speaker didn’t use visual aids but the speaker had a good pace so I can follow her speech easily. 6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -The speaker had proper body language and good eye contact as well. 7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -The tone of the speaker’s voice was good and clear, and the volume of the video was good. I understood everything in the video. Thank you for sharing!
Generic Presentation Evaluation Video: Great vacation idea Evaluator: Juyeon Oh
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? : Her topic was about a great vacation idea to Malaysia. She recommends Malaysia because of the beautiful weather and its food. It was well addressed because she kept it in a simple structure that showed reasons to visit and not visit.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? : Yes, there was a hook in the beginning when she asked a question about getting away from daily life. It was effective because it gave the audience to think about their time off and think about possible destinations.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? : Yes, she had a firm structure in her speech, she had a beginning, 2 main reasons and a conclusion. She stated specific examples on why people would love Malaysia, but also warned that some people might not like it. The transition was well done as she did moved to the next point smoothly.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? : She had a concise conclusion. She finished off by guaranteeing that people will have an amazing time but did not restate the main points. But because she highly recommended the place, it can be said that it was memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.: She did not use humour, but she took pauses in between. In order for a speech to be effective, pauses are very important and she did them well by keeping her pace relatively slow for the listeners to understand better. She didn't have any visual aids.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. : She didn't move very much in her speech, but she kept her hands together. I don't know if this was intentional or just her trying to get hold of her nerves. It could have been better if she had them by her sides. She had a comfortable eye contact.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? : The volume was good, there were no difficulties in hearing her words, she enunciated the word clearly so that the contents could be understood. Very well done!
Evaluator: Sungtae Kim Date: 2016/06/06 1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The speaker introduced her own opinions about SNS. She talked about side effects of SNS. First, she said that SNS can be harmful for self-esteem. Also, sometimes the information that flows in SNS can be incorrect. She concluded by restating her opinion and saying that we should be careful when use internet. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? There was effective hook. She introduced her topic and explained it by listing examples. Then she introduced opposite opinions and why people think SNS is beneficial. This was interesting and was a very good hook. But just to improve it more she could have used her own experience in the hook, so that it can literally hook up people’s interest. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? The speech is well-organized. She used her own experience of using SNS which was quite impressive, and connected two supporting details that made the transition smooth. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? It was concise and memorable. She restated her main topic and reasons. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids? She didn’t use humor or visual aid but used effective pauses which helped the audience catch important points. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. It was easy to see her body postures that helped listeners concentrate to the issue. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? The voice was loud enough that everyone could hear her. Thank you for sharing:)
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채) Video : opinion speech
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? The overall purpose of the speech was to talk about the negative aspects of SNS. She says that SNS is bad for individuals as it could decrease people’s self-esteem and it provides too much information to citizens. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? She gives the hook about SNS and its’ benefits at the beginning of the speech, and I think it was effective. However, it would have been better if it was a little shorter. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes, it was. She had two strong ideas to support her opinion. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? She ends her speech by saying that for her two reasons, she does not agree with the use of SNS. If she mentioned what these two reasons were, it would have been better. 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, She did have a lot of pauses in her speech that was helpful when she was making her speech. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She had strong eye contact and body languages during her presentation. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes, her voice was clear and audible. I did not have much problems while I was listening to her presentation.
Speaker : Sunyoung Park Evaluator : Hyunjin Song Title : Opinion
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? She wanted to talk about the bad influence of SNS and it was addressed well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? It was very effective. She had main 2 reasons for her argument. And those reasons were clear and logical.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? Yes. At first, she briefly talked about the main topic she want to say and the whole speech was filled with logical evidence and her own experiences(used as examples). Her speech was well organized. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? Yes. In the closing, she restated her opinion and that was concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, Obviously she used pauses in her speech and i really liked that. It could attract the attention and even though there were not visual aids, her speech was impressive.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. She tried to make an eye contact in the overall speech and she also used some gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? Yes. She did a good job! I could understand her opinion clearly and I could also agree with her because her reasons were persuasive.
Speaker : Sunyoung Park Evaluator: Seounho Kim Date: 06.08.2017
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She wanted to talk about the person she admires. She used to think of his father as a bossy person so she dismissed her father and it led to a lot of arguments. But one day she realized that her father was trying to change her characteristic. Through this she could his genuine mind and it touched her mind. So by seeing her father she decided to change herself rather than wanting others to do so.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was a great hook and I could see this through her speech. She organized the speech by first introducing her father and then her argument with him and what made her rethink about her characteristic.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She first introduced her father as a person whom she admires the most. I could see the structure was logical by listening to the way she changed her stereotype about her father. I just thought it would little bit better if she had suggested more evidence or reasons for choosing him as a person whom she admires.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She restated why she admires her father and what it was all about. She said what she learned from her father was the essence of the relationship. Her closing was also memorable as I could think of my selfish characteristic like she did.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
As she used anecdote between herself and her father the overall speech was really interesting.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She used cards instead of using whole speech paper so the eye contanct was natural enough. I think it would be better if she would have used more various gestures. Without this it was really good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume of her voice was perfect and she spoke every word and sentence clearly. So there was no difficulties understanding her speech.
Title : Icebreaker Evaluator : Jaehee Chung Speaker : Sunyoung Park Date : 2017.06.08
1. What strong points does the speaker already have? -She is good at delivering her messages (with clear voice and adequate speed) 2. How well did the audience get to know the speaker? -I got to know about her difficulties and how she overcame it. I could feel her passion in translation 3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation? -Yes, I think she had practiced a lot because I could see her confidence in her face and the order of her talk was easy to follow. 4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly? -Yes, she talked clearly, with right volume and speed 5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion? -Yes, the opening which encouraged audience was interesting and she had conclusion in the same context. In the body part, she talked about how she got to get courage and overcome her worries about uncertain future. 6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes. -She used a short notes to check and remember the order of her speech but didn’t just read the whole thing on the notes. I think it is a prime example of using notes in a speech 7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech? -Maybe it would have been more interesting with some visual aids but I think it is not that necessary because she made her speech appealing enough without any. I thought it would have been better if she had spelled “movie gv” on the board because it was little bit hard to catch at once. 8. What did you like about the presentation? -I liked how she talked about her own story which showed her passion and I was very touched by it. Her natural gestures and face expressions made it an eloquent speech.
Evaluator : Jaehee Chung Speaker : Hyobin Jeon Video : Unit 1 / A person I Admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? -She introduced Yuna Kim and explained the reasons why she admires her. She talked about Yuna Kim’s passion. 2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? -I didn’t find any hook in this video. 3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? -Yes, she gave various reasons why she admires Yuna Kim and explained it logically. 4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? -She made clear conclusion linking her own future with examples of Yuna Kim . 5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids, -She didn’t use any visual aids but she used pauses perfectly!! It was really easy to follow her speech because of pauses. 6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. -I found that the posture is little bit rigid but she made adequate eye contacts and looked very confident. 7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? -She spoke in adequate volume and pronounced clearly enough that everything was understood.
Evaluator: Ka Pui Cheung
ReplyDeleteSpeaker: Sunyoung Park
Video: Unit 4
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-The speaker talked about the progress for interpreting. The speaker talked about the differences between consecutive interpreting and simultaneous interpreting, and the three progresses of interpreting. First, understanding. Second, analyzing. Third, re-expressing.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-A hook is quite difficult to find in this speech. It would be better to ask a rhetorical question at the start.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, the structure was well-organized, and the transition was smooth.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-It would be better to restate the main points again or add the concluding remarks in the conclusion.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
- The speaker didn’t use visual aids but the speaker had a good pace so I can follow her speech easily.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-The speaker had proper body language and good eye contact as well.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-The tone of the speaker’s voice was good and clear, and the volume of the video was good. I understood everything in the video. Thank you for sharing!
Generic Presentation Evaluation
ReplyDeleteVideo: Great vacation idea
Evaluator: Juyeon Oh
1.What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed? :
Her topic was about a great vacation idea to Malaysia. She recommends Malaysia because of the beautiful weather and its food. It was well addressed because she kept it in a simple structure that showed reasons to visit and not visit.
2.Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved? :
Yes, there was a hook in the beginning when she asked a question about getting away from daily life. It was effective because it gave the audience to think about their time off and think about possible destinations.
3.Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas? :
Yes, she had a firm structure in her speech, she had a beginning, 2 main reasons and a conclusion. She stated specific examples on why people would love Malaysia, but also warned that some people might not like it. The transition was well done as she did moved to the next point smoothly.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable? :
She had a concise conclusion. She finished off by guaranteeing that people will have an amazing time but did not restate the main points. But because she highly recommended the place, it can be said that it was memorable.
5.Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids.:
She did not use humour, but she took pauses in between. In order for a speech to be effective, pauses are very important and she did them well by keeping her pace relatively slow for the listeners to understand better. She didn't have any visual aids.
6.What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures. :
She didn't move very much in her speech, but she kept her hands together. I don't know if this was intentional or just her trying to get hold of her nerves. It could have been better if she had them by her sides. She had a comfortable eye contact.
7.Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood? :
The volume was good, there were no difficulties in hearing her words, she enunciated the word clearly so that the contents could be understood. Very well done!
Evaluator: Sungtae Kim
ReplyDeleteDate: 2016/06/06
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The speaker introduced her own opinions about SNS. She talked about side effects of SNS. First, she said that SNS can be harmful for self-esteem. Also, sometimes the information that flows in SNS can be incorrect. She concluded by restating her opinion and saying that we should be careful when use internet.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was effective hook. She introduced her topic and explained it by listing examples. Then she introduced opposite opinions and why people think SNS is beneficial. This was interesting and was a very good hook. But just to improve it more she could have used her own experience in the hook, so that it can literally hook up people’s interest.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
The speech is well-organized. She used her own experience of using SNS which was quite impressive, and connected two supporting details that made the transition smooth.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
It was concise and memorable. She restated her main topic and reasons.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids?
She didn’t use humor or visual aid but used effective pauses which helped the audience catch important points.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
It was easy to see her body postures that helped listeners concentrate to the issue.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The voice was loud enough that everyone could hear her.
Thank you for sharing:)
Evaluator : Seungchae Na(나승채)
ReplyDeleteVideo : opinion speech
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
The overall purpose of the speech was to talk about the negative aspects of SNS. She says that SNS is bad for individuals as it could decrease people’s self-esteem and it provides too much information to citizens.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
She gives the hook about SNS and its’ benefits at the beginning of the speech, and I think it was effective. However, it would have been better if it was a little shorter.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes, it was. She had two strong ideas to support her opinion.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She ends her speech by saying that for her two reasons, she does not agree with the use of SNS. If she mentioned what these two reasons were, it would have been better.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
She did have a lot of pauses in her speech that was helpful when she was making her speech.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She had strong eye contact and body languages during her presentation.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes, her voice was clear and audible. I did not have much problems while I was listening to her presentation.
Speaker : Sunyoung Park
ReplyDeleteEvaluator : Hyunjin Song
Title : Opinion
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She wanted to talk about the bad influence of SNS and it was addressed well.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
It was very effective. She had main 2 reasons for her argument. And those reasons were clear and logical.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
Yes. At first, she briefly talked about the main topic she want to say and the whole speech was filled with logical evidence and her own experiences(used as examples). Her speech was well organized.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
Yes. In the closing, she restated her opinion and that was concise.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
Obviously she used pauses in her speech and i really liked that. It could attract the attention and even though there were not visual aids, her speech was impressive.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She tried to make an eye contact in the overall speech and she also used some gestures.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
Yes. She did a good job! I could understand her opinion clearly and I could also agree with her because her reasons were persuasive.
Speaker : Sunyoung Park
ReplyDeleteEvaluator: Seounho Kim
Date: 06.08.2017
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
She wanted to talk about the person she admires. She used to think of his father as a bossy person so she dismissed her father and it led to a lot of arguments. But one day she realized that her father was trying to change her characteristic. Through this she could his genuine mind and it touched her mind. So by seeing her father she decided to change herself rather than wanting others to do so.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
There was a great hook and I could see this through her speech. She organized the speech by first introducing her father and then her argument with him and what made her rethink about her characteristic.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
She first introduced her father as a person whom she admires the most. I could see the structure was logical by listening to the way she changed her stereotype about her father. I just thought it would little bit better if she had suggested more evidence or reasons for choosing him as a person whom she admires.
4.Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
She restated why she admires her father and what it was all about. She said what she learned from her father was the essence of the relationship. Her closing was also memorable as I could think of my selfish characteristic like she did.
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids
As she used anecdote between herself and her father the overall speech was really interesting.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
She used cards instead of using whole speech paper so the eye contanct was natural enough. I think it would be better if she would have used more various gestures. Without this it was really good.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
The volume of her voice was perfect and she spoke every word and sentence clearly. So there was no difficulties understanding her speech.
ReplyDeleteTitle : Icebreaker
Evaluator : Jaehee Chung
Speaker : Sunyoung Park
Date : 2017.06.08
1. What strong points does the speaker already have?
-She is good at delivering her messages (with clear voice and adequate speed)
2. How well did the audience get to know the speaker?
-I got to know about her difficulties and how she overcame it. I could feel her passion in translation
3. Did the speech reflect adequate preparation?
-Yes, I think she had practiced a lot because I could see her confidence in her face and the order of her talk was easy to follow.
4. Did the speaker talk clearly and audibly?
-Yes, she talked clearly, with right volume and speed
5. Did the speech have a definite opening, body, and conclusion?
-Yes, the opening which encouraged audience was interesting and she had conclusion in the same context. In the body part, she talked about how she got to get courage and overcome her worries about uncertain future.
6. Please comment on the speaker’s use of notes.
-She used a short notes to check and remember the order of her speech but didn’t just read the whole thing on the notes. I think it is a prime example of using notes in a speech
7. What could the speaker have done differently that would have improved the speech?
-Maybe it would have been more interesting with some visual aids but I think it is not that necessary because she made her speech appealing enough without any. I thought it would have been better if she had spelled “movie gv” on the board because it was little bit hard to catch at once.
8. What did you like about the presentation?
-I liked how she talked about her own story which showed her passion and I was very touched by it. Her natural gestures and face expressions made it an eloquent speech.
Evaluator : Jaehee Chung
ReplyDeleteSpeaker : Hyobin Jeon
Video : Unit 1 / A person I Admire
1. What was the overall purpose of the speech. Try to restate or summarize the main point. How well was it addressed?
-She introduced Yuna Kim and explained the reasons why she admires her. She talked about Yuna Kim’s passion.
2. Was there a hook? Was it effective? How could it have been improved?
-I didn’t find any hook in this video.
3. Was the structure logical? Point supported by evidence or examples? Good transitions between ideas?
-Yes, she gave various reasons why she admires Yuna Kim and explained it logically.
4. Was the conclusion concise? Were main points restated or summarized? Was the closing memorable?
-She made clear conclusion linking her own future with examples of Yuna Kim .
5. Did the speaker use enthusiasm, pauses, humor, visual aids,
-She didn’t use any visual aids but she used pauses perfectly!! It was really easy to follow her speech because of pauses.
6. What did you notice about the speaker’s body language? Posture, eye contact, gestures.
-I found that the posture is little bit rigid but she made adequate eye contacts and looked very confident.
7. Was the volume good? Did the speaker enunciate and pronounce clearly? Could everything be understood?
-She spoke in adequate volume and pronounced clearly enough that everything was understood.